This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Madonna template. |
|
Madonna Template‑class | |||||||
|
Pop music Template‑class | |||||||
|
Before placing album cover images on a navigation template, please read Fair use, Template:Fair use and Template:Album cover, and note that Wikipedia is attempting to cut down use of "Fair use" images. Please discuss the issue here or at the other Template talk pages. Jkelly 23:04, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
What is the criteria for putting a song in the "Greatest Hits" section of this template? Jkelly 01:07, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
I merged the templates Template:Madonna singles and Template:Madonna -- Red-Blue-White 23:51, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
The Madonna discography is much bigger than the MJ one - and it's still growing. If we use the small categories template, it's the same like the "see also" section - (or the categories at the bottom) The actual template is much bigger - but I think it's more comfortable to find albums and singles with one click. Other sites (Star Wars or Lemony Snicket) have much bigger templates. It's on you. -- Red-Blue-White 05:13, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
Does this template really need to take up half of each article page? It just seems so silly to include every album and book when anyone can just click Madonna discography or Madonna bibliography and find all of the albums and books there. Sure, it's an extra click of the mouse, but at least the template doesn't look like it's about to explode.
The videography section of the big template especially irritates me. Most of those articles have only small sections on the music videos. If we're going to keep the big template, it would make more sense to have a section of singles than music videos.
Anyway, thoughts? -- Charity 00:37, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
I'd question the inclusion of this in the template, as it's not a significantly different item to the regular Immaculate Collection (and doesn't merit a separate entry away from that title). Everything else in the other compilations category has a significantly different track listing to its 'parent' item and has its own separate entry, so I'd be inclined to drop this. Thoughts? Gusworld ( talk) 06:51, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
And music video DVDs. Surely these sections aren't necessary. 99.135.13.124 ( talk) 18:10, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
Per Wikipedia:WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers#Filmography navbox templates, we do not have filmographies for actors in navboxes. Only her directing roles should be included. No other actors have acting navboxes, and there is no case for exception to be made here. -- Rob Sinden ( talk) 13:16, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
(→) Can an admin be involved? This is getting really irritating when a full open discussion is going on and this user is going on reverting. — Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 12:06, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Madonna template. |
|
Madonna Template‑class | |||||||
|
Pop music Template‑class | |||||||
|
Before placing album cover images on a navigation template, please read Fair use, Template:Fair use and Template:Album cover, and note that Wikipedia is attempting to cut down use of "Fair use" images. Please discuss the issue here or at the other Template talk pages. Jkelly 23:04, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
What is the criteria for putting a song in the "Greatest Hits" section of this template? Jkelly 01:07, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
I merged the templates Template:Madonna singles and Template:Madonna -- Red-Blue-White 23:51, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
The Madonna discography is much bigger than the MJ one - and it's still growing. If we use the small categories template, it's the same like the "see also" section - (or the categories at the bottom) The actual template is much bigger - but I think it's more comfortable to find albums and singles with one click. Other sites (Star Wars or Lemony Snicket) have much bigger templates. It's on you. -- Red-Blue-White 05:13, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
Does this template really need to take up half of each article page? It just seems so silly to include every album and book when anyone can just click Madonna discography or Madonna bibliography and find all of the albums and books there. Sure, it's an extra click of the mouse, but at least the template doesn't look like it's about to explode.
The videography section of the big template especially irritates me. Most of those articles have only small sections on the music videos. If we're going to keep the big template, it would make more sense to have a section of singles than music videos.
Anyway, thoughts? -- Charity 00:37, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
I'd question the inclusion of this in the template, as it's not a significantly different item to the regular Immaculate Collection (and doesn't merit a separate entry away from that title). Everything else in the other compilations category has a significantly different track listing to its 'parent' item and has its own separate entry, so I'd be inclined to drop this. Thoughts? Gusworld ( talk) 06:51, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
And music video DVDs. Surely these sections aren't necessary. 99.135.13.124 ( talk) 18:10, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
Per Wikipedia:WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers#Filmography navbox templates, we do not have filmographies for actors in navboxes. Only her directing roles should be included. No other actors have acting navboxes, and there is no case for exception to be made here. -- Rob Sinden ( talk) 13:16, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
(→) Can an admin be involved? This is getting really irritating when a full open discussion is going on and this user is going on reverting. — Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 12:06, 6 May 2015 (UTC)