Central Asia: Kazakhstan Template‑class | ||||||||||
|
I made the change to {{ Kazakhstan topics}} so it would auto collapse like the other navboxes used in Kazakhstan and other uses. --— Gadget850 (Ed) talk - 12:56, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Propose that |state = uncollapsed
be removed to allow the navbox to be autocollapsed in articles like
Kazakhstan. This will match the useage of the other
Kazakh navigational boxes. --—
Gadget850 (Ed)
talk - 21:05, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Please, check the templates of ANY other country ( USA, Russia, Armenia, Germany...) They are all uncollapsed!!!! The usage of this box is "SEE ALSO". —Preceding unsigned comment added by BernardTom ( talk • contribs) 22:19, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
BernardTom is correct that when used in the "See Also" section, such templates are not collapsed (see
Argentina,
Canada,
Italy,
Malta,
New Zealand,
Russia,
South Africa,
Spain,
Turkey,
Ukraine,
United Kingdom,
United States,
Vietnam). That being said, most of those templates are set to auto-collapse, and then on the "See Also" section someone adds |state=expanded
. Given that on every other page besides
Kazakhstan, this template will be collapsed, it should not have |state = uncollapsed
.
Otebig (
talk) 02:49, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
There's a space at the bottom of them template (see Kazakh Soviet Socialist Republic and Postage stamps and postal history of Kazakhstan for examples). Can anyone get rid of this? Otebig ( talk) 03:53, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
Since all the information on the Politics of Kazakhstan template is now on this template, I'm going to start removing the former from the articles to avoid duplication. It makes more sense to have one general template, plus horizontal templates are better for page layout than vertical templates. Otebig ( talk) 04:56, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
Anti-nuclear movement in Kazakhstan should be included in this template, but has been twice removed: [1] and [2]. Also, entries within a group should be alphabetical, for consistency and readability. Johnfos ( talk) 04:28, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
What I think BernardTom is trying to say is that the Anti-Nuclear Movement in Kazakhstan falls under the broader heading "History of Kazakhstan", and more specifically "Kazakh SSR" and/or "Republic of Kazakhstan" (those are on the third line of the template, under the section "since 1456"). Since the template is for "top" topics ("Kazakh SSR"/"ROK"), movements which occurred during those time period ( Jeltoqsan, for example, as well as the Anti-nuclear movement) don't go on the template as well. I'm not sure how well I explained that - does it make sense? Otebig ( talk) 18:14, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
Central Asia: Kazakhstan Template‑class | ||||||||||
|
I made the change to {{ Kazakhstan topics}} so it would auto collapse like the other navboxes used in Kazakhstan and other uses. --— Gadget850 (Ed) talk - 12:56, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Propose that |state = uncollapsed
be removed to allow the navbox to be autocollapsed in articles like
Kazakhstan. This will match the useage of the other
Kazakh navigational boxes. --—
Gadget850 (Ed)
talk - 21:05, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Please, check the templates of ANY other country ( USA, Russia, Armenia, Germany...) They are all uncollapsed!!!! The usage of this box is "SEE ALSO". —Preceding unsigned comment added by BernardTom ( talk • contribs) 22:19, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
BernardTom is correct that when used in the "See Also" section, such templates are not collapsed (see
Argentina,
Canada,
Italy,
Malta,
New Zealand,
Russia,
South Africa,
Spain,
Turkey,
Ukraine,
United Kingdom,
United States,
Vietnam). That being said, most of those templates are set to auto-collapse, and then on the "See Also" section someone adds |state=expanded
. Given that on every other page besides
Kazakhstan, this template will be collapsed, it should not have |state = uncollapsed
.
Otebig (
talk) 02:49, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
There's a space at the bottom of them template (see Kazakh Soviet Socialist Republic and Postage stamps and postal history of Kazakhstan for examples). Can anyone get rid of this? Otebig ( talk) 03:53, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
Since all the information on the Politics of Kazakhstan template is now on this template, I'm going to start removing the former from the articles to avoid duplication. It makes more sense to have one general template, plus horizontal templates are better for page layout than vertical templates. Otebig ( talk) 04:56, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
Anti-nuclear movement in Kazakhstan should be included in this template, but has been twice removed: [1] and [2]. Also, entries within a group should be alphabetical, for consistency and readability. Johnfos ( talk) 04:28, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
What I think BernardTom is trying to say is that the Anti-Nuclear Movement in Kazakhstan falls under the broader heading "History of Kazakhstan", and more specifically "Kazakh SSR" and/or "Republic of Kazakhstan" (those are on the third line of the template, under the section "since 1456"). Since the template is for "top" topics ("Kazakh SSR"/"ROK"), movements which occurred during those time period ( Jeltoqsan, for example, as well as the Anti-nuclear movement) don't go on the template as well. I'm not sure how well I explained that - does it make sense? Otebig ( talk) 18:14, 17 August 2008 (UTC)