This template is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
I have not included parties which were used only for one year and which were not affiliates of a national party. This leads to an awkward result, but is a good general rule, I think. – PhilosopherLet us reason together. 20:19, 29 January 2013 (UTC)reply
Iowa Party
The awkward result. The
Iowa Party label has just been used once, but came extremely close to the 2% threshold for becoming an official party - 1.8% of the vote to the 2.0% needed. Additionally, "it" appears to have been two separate parties, as there was a state legislative candidate also running under that banner who was not affiliated with its gubernatorial campaign. – PhilosopherLet us reason together. 20:19, 29 January 2013 (UTC)reply
This template is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
I have not included parties which were used only for one year and which were not affiliates of a national party. This leads to an awkward result, but is a good general rule, I think. – PhilosopherLet us reason together. 20:19, 29 January 2013 (UTC)reply
Iowa Party
The awkward result. The
Iowa Party label has just been used once, but came extremely close to the 2% threshold for becoming an official party - 1.8% of the vote to the 2.0% needed. Additionally, "it" appears to have been two separate parties, as there was a state legislative candidate also running under that banner who was not affiliated with its gubernatorial campaign. – PhilosopherLet us reason together. 20:19, 29 January 2013 (UTC)reply