Football Template‑class | |||||||
|
A sporting copmpetition is either between nations, or between clubs. Ocassionally, competitions like the King's Cup might mix club and national selections, but these are usually tournaments of low significance, and are not the subject matter of this template. IMHO, multi-national participation, does not equate to international competition: a player at, for example, Cork City, who played against Appollon Limassol last July, is not thereby an international footballer, ergo this is not an international competition (And as for the Intercontinental cup: that was an appalling abuse of the language). Kevin McE 20:55, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
Is this FIFA document proof enough? — Lesfer (t/ c/ @) 19:58, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
I would suggest that the header on FIFA Club World Cup is sufficient to allow deletion of both of the now extinct precursors of this competition from this box.
Copa Sudamerican IS NOT for those who didn't make it to teh Copa Libertadores. Teams quealified for teh Copa Libertadores ALSO qualify for the COpa Sudamericana. But Copa Sudamericana gives countries 1 to 4 more spots, as well as having two teams (River and Boca) qualified automatically... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.143.60.2 ( talk) 18:00, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
How about adding the Super cups to this template? ( UEFA Super Cup, Recopa Sudamericana, etc.) IJK_Principle ( talk) 19:41, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
Odd goings on here last night. An unregistered editor changed the content, giving ostensibly valid reasons for doing so. This was reverted without explanation: the same edit was repeated and undone again, unfortunately without having been brought to discussion as BRD would suggest. A different IP address then imposed the change for a third time: possibly the same editor, possibly not, resulting in a third reversion, still with no justification of the inclusion of the content being contested, and page protection on the grounds of "excessive sockpuppetry": maybe once is more than enough, but excessive?
This looks very much like assumption that existing content is ideal, and out of hand dismissal of any edit. So why are competitions that are only available to a geographical subset of the confederation's area included for the CONCACAF zone? Kevin McE ( talk) 06:32, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
This is a club competition template: is it reasonable to have awards that are made to individuals on it. Although many of the performances that will catch the voters' eyes will be in these competitions, others will be in domestic competition, and others will be for national sides. I would propose that links to Player of the year/Ballon D'Or are inappropriate here. Kevin McE ( talk) 00:19, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
This navbox has hundreds of inclusions [1]. I propose to remove from pages not listed in it. 109.108.250.225 ( talk) 07:55, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Football Template‑class | |||||||
|
A sporting copmpetition is either between nations, or between clubs. Ocassionally, competitions like the King's Cup might mix club and national selections, but these are usually tournaments of low significance, and are not the subject matter of this template. IMHO, multi-national participation, does not equate to international competition: a player at, for example, Cork City, who played against Appollon Limassol last July, is not thereby an international footballer, ergo this is not an international competition (And as for the Intercontinental cup: that was an appalling abuse of the language). Kevin McE 20:55, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
Is this FIFA document proof enough? — Lesfer (t/ c/ @) 19:58, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
I would suggest that the header on FIFA Club World Cup is sufficient to allow deletion of both of the now extinct precursors of this competition from this box.
Copa Sudamerican IS NOT for those who didn't make it to teh Copa Libertadores. Teams quealified for teh Copa Libertadores ALSO qualify for the COpa Sudamericana. But Copa Sudamericana gives countries 1 to 4 more spots, as well as having two teams (River and Boca) qualified automatically... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.143.60.2 ( talk) 18:00, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
How about adding the Super cups to this template? ( UEFA Super Cup, Recopa Sudamericana, etc.) IJK_Principle ( talk) 19:41, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
Odd goings on here last night. An unregistered editor changed the content, giving ostensibly valid reasons for doing so. This was reverted without explanation: the same edit was repeated and undone again, unfortunately without having been brought to discussion as BRD would suggest. A different IP address then imposed the change for a third time: possibly the same editor, possibly not, resulting in a third reversion, still with no justification of the inclusion of the content being contested, and page protection on the grounds of "excessive sockpuppetry": maybe once is more than enough, but excessive?
This looks very much like assumption that existing content is ideal, and out of hand dismissal of any edit. So why are competitions that are only available to a geographical subset of the confederation's area included for the CONCACAF zone? Kevin McE ( talk) 06:32, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
This is a club competition template: is it reasonable to have awards that are made to individuals on it. Although many of the performances that will catch the voters' eyes will be in these competitions, others will be in domestic competition, and others will be for national sides. I would propose that links to Player of the year/Ballon D'Or are inappropriate here. Kevin McE ( talk) 00:19, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
This navbox has hundreds of inclusions [1]. I propose to remove from pages not listed in it. 109.108.250.225 ( talk) 07:55, 8 April 2016 (UTC)