United Kingdom Template‑class | |||||||
|
Media Template‑class | ||||||||||||||
|
having STV and ITV London linked is a lot simpler for readers than them having to go through the Scottish/Grampian and Carlton/LWT articles to get to them — Preceding unsigned comment added by PMA ( talk • contribs)
I am just wondering why the broadcasting regulators are part of the template, it does give the impression that they are part of ITV to those readers who may not know about ITV and the broadcasting regulators. To avoid confusion, would it be better to remove the regulators? (or at least create a separate template for the regulators?) -- tgheretford ( talk) 21:02, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Who is the a*** hole that keeps changing this template and making it huge? GMc talk 20:50, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
I widened the template by 25 pixels, as the previous width (595) was causing at least two of the lines to wrap a single word onto the following lines (which is why arbitrary use of line-breaks in templates should probably be avoided). Pixel-based widths are also probably a bad idea, as in general they do not degrade gracefully (when faced with a viewport that isn't wide enough, Bad Things™ can happen), but that's a problem for another day. 81.104.170.167 19:21, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
This looks clunky and incorrect. ITV London is also a "non-franchise" region if you wish to include them - or otherwise leave them as "ITV Regions". Marbles333 15:04, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
I suggest that we give the template a little makeover. Something like this:
The sections at the bottom are pontless, containing 1 link each. Why not merge them into an "other"? Anthrcer (click to talk to me) 12:52, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
How about this? Splitting this temp into three temps: ITV, ITV plc and ITV Franchises (Historical).
Because, for example, Friends Reunited is owned bt ITV plc, Not the ITV Network. Also, the file size.
Template ITV plc is a place for the PLC-owned-franchises, ITV digital channels and websites while ITV Franchises (Historical) contains the links to the historical franchise holders.
-- JSH-alive (talk) (cntrbtns) (mail me) 08:57, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
I decided to be bold, and add this to the template. If anyone has a problem, then feel free to reply and revert. Thanks, Malpass93 ( talk) 12:04, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
First off I strongly disagree that making it yellow is lurid and unnecessary, as its one of ITV corporate colours If you not happy about:
Nearly All the templates on wiki are look the same, why cant some not have the colour of company its linked to? Crazyseiko ( talk)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
You should add the Templates of STV and of UTV, they're all the same agency anyway, they're all part of the same ITV Network. 95.236.181.137 ( talk) 13:18, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
United Kingdom Template‑class | |||||||
|
Media Template‑class | ||||||||||||||
|
having STV and ITV London linked is a lot simpler for readers than them having to go through the Scottish/Grampian and Carlton/LWT articles to get to them — Preceding unsigned comment added by PMA ( talk • contribs)
I am just wondering why the broadcasting regulators are part of the template, it does give the impression that they are part of ITV to those readers who may not know about ITV and the broadcasting regulators. To avoid confusion, would it be better to remove the regulators? (or at least create a separate template for the regulators?) -- tgheretford ( talk) 21:02, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Who is the a*** hole that keeps changing this template and making it huge? GMc talk 20:50, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
I widened the template by 25 pixels, as the previous width (595) was causing at least two of the lines to wrap a single word onto the following lines (which is why arbitrary use of line-breaks in templates should probably be avoided). Pixel-based widths are also probably a bad idea, as in general they do not degrade gracefully (when faced with a viewport that isn't wide enough, Bad Things™ can happen), but that's a problem for another day. 81.104.170.167 19:21, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
This looks clunky and incorrect. ITV London is also a "non-franchise" region if you wish to include them - or otherwise leave them as "ITV Regions". Marbles333 15:04, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
I suggest that we give the template a little makeover. Something like this:
The sections at the bottom are pontless, containing 1 link each. Why not merge them into an "other"? Anthrcer (click to talk to me) 12:52, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
How about this? Splitting this temp into three temps: ITV, ITV plc and ITV Franchises (Historical).
Because, for example, Friends Reunited is owned bt ITV plc, Not the ITV Network. Also, the file size.
Template ITV plc is a place for the PLC-owned-franchises, ITV digital channels and websites while ITV Franchises (Historical) contains the links to the historical franchise holders.
-- JSH-alive (talk) (cntrbtns) (mail me) 08:57, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
I decided to be bold, and add this to the template. If anyone has a problem, then feel free to reply and revert. Thanks, Malpass93 ( talk) 12:04, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
First off I strongly disagree that making it yellow is lurid and unnecessary, as its one of ITV corporate colours If you not happy about:
Nearly All the templates on wiki are look the same, why cant some not have the colour of company its linked to? Crazyseiko ( talk)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
You should add the Templates of STV and of UTV, they're all the same agency anyway, they're all part of the same ITV Network. 95.236.181.137 ( talk) 13:18, 6 March 2016 (UTC)