This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 7 sections are present. |
A new template version has been installed - mostly to improve accessibility by increasing the font-size of text [and better colors (a/o 20240310)] - hope this new template is *entirely* ok - please comment if otherwise of course - related timelines include: {{Life timeline}} and {{Nature timeline}} - in any case - Stay Safe and Healthy !! - Drbogdan ( talk) 01:13, 5 June 2021 (UTC) [edit added - Drbogdan ( talk) 21:31, 10 March 2024 (UTC)]
ORIGINAL (2016 – 2021) |
OLD (2021 – 2024) ( test version/sandbox5) | NEW (2024 – current) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
Passing through and was interested in the figure in this template. I thought it was [a] great display of information, very well-done. The one thing that I couldn't find was a legend explaining the differences in the shades of orange around the names of the species. It seems to be a detail that was overlooked when the figure was being designed. Can someone who worked on this figure add something that explains why the orange shading gets lighter toward the top? CoffeeHawk ( talk) 01:01, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
I can't see an explanation of the 2 'columns' at the left, where the background colour changes are at different times from those where the "H. erectus" etc. text appears. I've tried to make sense of it with "in Africa", or "in Asia", but nothing really seems to work. Can brief text be added to explain them? Peace Makes Plenty ( talk) 14:22, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
All the shades of orange here are much too dark for Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Accessibility/Colors, when used as a background for blue link text. They should be swapped for lighter colours; probably a range of different ones, if they still need to look visibly distinct. -- Belbury ( talk) 16:04, 8 March 2024 (UTC)\
Done @ Belbury: (and others) - template has now been updated with better accessibility colors - and installed in main wiki space - should now be ok - please comment if otherwise of course - iac - Stay Safe and Healthy !! - Drbogdan ( talk) 21:36, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In fact Homo Sapiens Neanderthalensis invented clothing before Homo Sapiens Sapiens, the timeline should be updated to reflect when clothing was first invented and by whom... "According to the study, our extinct relatives, the Neanderthals, likely made clothing before us using similar bone tools about 15,000 to 70,000 years ago." https://hyperallergic.com/681497/scientists-have-found-the-earliest-evidence-of-leather-clothes/
The study, curiously is the same one used to claim homo sapiens were the first to invent clothes -_- https://www.cell.com/iscience/fulltext/S2589-0042(21)00956-1 98.97.45.204 ( talk) 00:50, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
References
Phylogenetic analysis suggests that early hominids may have adopted cooking 1.8 million to 2.3 million years agobut a) that is just one study without direct evidence (but genetic data) b) skimming the study I couldn't find where it got the "1.8 million to 2.3 million years" from, or at least the "to 2.3 million years".
Prototyperspective ( talk) 10:20, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Why is this timeline not scaled/presented differently depending on the article. For example, Middle Paleolithic ranges from 300kya to 30kya, yet the timeline goes on to 10mya. It's can definitely be confusing for readers, as I just had to explain to my son that it's not a timeline that is proportionate to the main range of the article. 104.128.253.245 ( talk) 04:55, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
@ Hike395 and PrimeHunter: TEMPLATE PROBLEM: For some reason, seems the Neanderthal and Denisovan template items (remmed out at present) are currently displaying vertically instead of horizontally as earlier and as originally intended - is there some way of correcting this? - Thanking you in advance for your reply - Stay Safe and Healthy !! - Drbogdan ( talk) 20:27, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
@
LittleJerry: (and others) - Thank You for your recent
revert of the
Bonobo note on the
{{Human timeline}} - tried to include an appropriate note (ie,
"Bonobo split") at 2 mya re
bonobos based on the following: "According to studies published in 2017 by researchers at
The George Washington University, bonobos, along with common chimpanzees, split from the human line about 8 million years ago; moreover, bonobos split from the common chimpanzee line about 2 million years ago.
[1]
[2]
- tried
"Chimpanzee➔Bonobo" on the
{{Human timeline}} - and tried =>
"Bonobo-Chimp split" - Comments (and/or Suggestions) Welcome - iac - Stay Safe and Healthy !! -
Drbogdan (
talk) 12:06, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
References
Drbogdan ( talk) 12:06, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Could a link for LD 350-1 be inserted as a note at 2.8MYA, as something like "earliest known Homo"? Sangrala ( talk) 17:16, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 7 sections are present. |
A new template version has been installed - mostly to improve accessibility by increasing the font-size of text [and better colors (a/o 20240310)] - hope this new template is *entirely* ok - please comment if otherwise of course - related timelines include: {{Life timeline}} and {{Nature timeline}} - in any case - Stay Safe and Healthy !! - Drbogdan ( talk) 01:13, 5 June 2021 (UTC) [edit added - Drbogdan ( talk) 21:31, 10 March 2024 (UTC)]
ORIGINAL (2016 – 2021) |
OLD (2021 – 2024) ( test version/sandbox5) | NEW (2024 – current) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
Passing through and was interested in the figure in this template. I thought it was [a] great display of information, very well-done. The one thing that I couldn't find was a legend explaining the differences in the shades of orange around the names of the species. It seems to be a detail that was overlooked when the figure was being designed. Can someone who worked on this figure add something that explains why the orange shading gets lighter toward the top? CoffeeHawk ( talk) 01:01, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
I can't see an explanation of the 2 'columns' at the left, where the background colour changes are at different times from those where the "H. erectus" etc. text appears. I've tried to make sense of it with "in Africa", or "in Asia", but nothing really seems to work. Can brief text be added to explain them? Peace Makes Plenty ( talk) 14:22, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
All the shades of orange here are much too dark for Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Accessibility/Colors, when used as a background for blue link text. They should be swapped for lighter colours; probably a range of different ones, if they still need to look visibly distinct. -- Belbury ( talk) 16:04, 8 March 2024 (UTC)\
Done @ Belbury: (and others) - template has now been updated with better accessibility colors - and installed in main wiki space - should now be ok - please comment if otherwise of course - iac - Stay Safe and Healthy !! - Drbogdan ( talk) 21:36, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In fact Homo Sapiens Neanderthalensis invented clothing before Homo Sapiens Sapiens, the timeline should be updated to reflect when clothing was first invented and by whom... "According to the study, our extinct relatives, the Neanderthals, likely made clothing before us using similar bone tools about 15,000 to 70,000 years ago." https://hyperallergic.com/681497/scientists-have-found-the-earliest-evidence-of-leather-clothes/
The study, curiously is the same one used to claim homo sapiens were the first to invent clothes -_- https://www.cell.com/iscience/fulltext/S2589-0042(21)00956-1 98.97.45.204 ( talk) 00:50, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
References
Phylogenetic analysis suggests that early hominids may have adopted cooking 1.8 million to 2.3 million years agobut a) that is just one study without direct evidence (but genetic data) b) skimming the study I couldn't find where it got the "1.8 million to 2.3 million years" from, or at least the "to 2.3 million years".
Prototyperspective ( talk) 10:20, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Why is this timeline not scaled/presented differently depending on the article. For example, Middle Paleolithic ranges from 300kya to 30kya, yet the timeline goes on to 10mya. It's can definitely be confusing for readers, as I just had to explain to my son that it's not a timeline that is proportionate to the main range of the article. 104.128.253.245 ( talk) 04:55, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
@ Hike395 and PrimeHunter: TEMPLATE PROBLEM: For some reason, seems the Neanderthal and Denisovan template items (remmed out at present) are currently displaying vertically instead of horizontally as earlier and as originally intended - is there some way of correcting this? - Thanking you in advance for your reply - Stay Safe and Healthy !! - Drbogdan ( talk) 20:27, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
@
LittleJerry: (and others) - Thank You for your recent
revert of the
Bonobo note on the
{{Human timeline}} - tried to include an appropriate note (ie,
"Bonobo split") at 2 mya re
bonobos based on the following: "According to studies published in 2017 by researchers at
The George Washington University, bonobos, along with common chimpanzees, split from the human line about 8 million years ago; moreover, bonobos split from the common chimpanzee line about 2 million years ago.
[1]
[2]
- tried
"Chimpanzee➔Bonobo" on the
{{Human timeline}} - and tried =>
"Bonobo-Chimp split" - Comments (and/or Suggestions) Welcome - iac - Stay Safe and Healthy !! -
Drbogdan (
talk) 12:06, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
References
Drbogdan ( talk) 12:06, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Could a link for LD 350-1 be inserted as a note at 2.8MYA, as something like "earliest known Homo"? Sangrala ( talk) 17:16, 27 October 2023 (UTC)