Medicine: Reproductive Template‑class | ||||||||||
|
Since this is a large area, please consider whether there is a more specific template where an item is more appropriate before adding it to this one. In order to keep the size of this template manageable it has to give just general coverage, with more specific details left to individual articles or more narrowly focused templates. To that end, please propose/discuss items here on talk page before adding them to the template. Zodon ( talk) 09:25, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
Should Male infertility and Female infertility be added as sub-items under infertility? Thoughs? Zodon ( talk) 09:25, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
A recent edit raised question about the curly braces on the see also links. The curly braces indicate links to templates (rather than to articles). The see also link in the documentation section should certainly have the curly braces (per usual Wikipedia usage).
What about the links in the template itself? Should they be removed from the template (and just put in the documentation)? Is there some more readily understood way to indicate that the items are templates rather than articles? Thoughts? Thanks. Zodon ( talk) 02:00, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
A couple of editors have added celibacy to the template. (It was removed once by another editor, and I just removed again and initiated this discussion.)
I don't think it is appropriate on the template because:
If you think one (or more) of these articles should be on this template - please explain which one, and why, and why think this template would enhance the related article. Zodon ( talk) 09:45, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
There are several well formed articles in reproductive health that didn't fit on the template, thought maybe adding a history section to this template would give coverage without casting too broad a net. Thoughts? Zodon ( talk) 05:32, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
I added the policy section because Two child policy didn't seem to fit. (Not limited to just one country). Anything that is just about a particular country should probably go in the country section. I am not sure if this section will work - but if it gets too big or unfocused may be better to shelve off into another template. Zodon ( talk) 05:36, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
Recently an editor has questioned the inclusion of this section. Saying it is all over the place. I am not sure what that means. This section includes articles on Contraception, Family Planning, Birth Control, etc. in various countries/nations/states.
While the names of some of the articles may be a little obscure, if you look at the articles themselves they all deal with the above topics in the particular state. (For instance One child policy covers China's recent family planning policy. Reproductive Health Bill covers that of the Philippines.
I don't see much point in splitting off the by country coverage into its own template when there are so few of them. Zodon ( talk) 04:36, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
I'd like to add intersex to the section on 'rights', and disorders of sex development to 'disorders'. Given the existing contents of each section, they seem appropriate. Trankuility ( talk) 10:03, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
I'd like to add these two pages to the template. Compulsory sterilization to the section on Rights, and Preimplantation genetic diagnosis to the section on Planning. Any objections? Trankuility ( talk) 12:42, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved. Number 5 7 12:19, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Template:Reproductive health → Template:Human reproductive health – According to template's content. 195.147.25.84 ( talk) 09:29, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
Stumbled across Sexually active life expectancy and thought perhaps it could benefit from being added to this template? skarz ( talk) 16:56, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi all, this is just a friendly notice that I have just performed a somewhat sizable reorganization of the template, with several new subcategories and the addition of quite a few pages that I thought were necessary and sufficiently high-level. I am open to any and all feedback on these changes! Willmskinner ( talk) 23:42, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Medicine: Reproductive Template‑class | ||||||||||
|
Since this is a large area, please consider whether there is a more specific template where an item is more appropriate before adding it to this one. In order to keep the size of this template manageable it has to give just general coverage, with more specific details left to individual articles or more narrowly focused templates. To that end, please propose/discuss items here on talk page before adding them to the template. Zodon ( talk) 09:25, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
Should Male infertility and Female infertility be added as sub-items under infertility? Thoughs? Zodon ( talk) 09:25, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
A recent edit raised question about the curly braces on the see also links. The curly braces indicate links to templates (rather than to articles). The see also link in the documentation section should certainly have the curly braces (per usual Wikipedia usage).
What about the links in the template itself? Should they be removed from the template (and just put in the documentation)? Is there some more readily understood way to indicate that the items are templates rather than articles? Thoughts? Thanks. Zodon ( talk) 02:00, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
A couple of editors have added celibacy to the template. (It was removed once by another editor, and I just removed again and initiated this discussion.)
I don't think it is appropriate on the template because:
If you think one (or more) of these articles should be on this template - please explain which one, and why, and why think this template would enhance the related article. Zodon ( talk) 09:45, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
There are several well formed articles in reproductive health that didn't fit on the template, thought maybe adding a history section to this template would give coverage without casting too broad a net. Thoughts? Zodon ( talk) 05:32, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
I added the policy section because Two child policy didn't seem to fit. (Not limited to just one country). Anything that is just about a particular country should probably go in the country section. I am not sure if this section will work - but if it gets too big or unfocused may be better to shelve off into another template. Zodon ( talk) 05:36, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
Recently an editor has questioned the inclusion of this section. Saying it is all over the place. I am not sure what that means. This section includes articles on Contraception, Family Planning, Birth Control, etc. in various countries/nations/states.
While the names of some of the articles may be a little obscure, if you look at the articles themselves they all deal with the above topics in the particular state. (For instance One child policy covers China's recent family planning policy. Reproductive Health Bill covers that of the Philippines.
I don't see much point in splitting off the by country coverage into its own template when there are so few of them. Zodon ( talk) 04:36, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
I'd like to add intersex to the section on 'rights', and disorders of sex development to 'disorders'. Given the existing contents of each section, they seem appropriate. Trankuility ( talk) 10:03, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
I'd like to add these two pages to the template. Compulsory sterilization to the section on Rights, and Preimplantation genetic diagnosis to the section on Planning. Any objections? Trankuility ( talk) 12:42, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved. Number 5 7 12:19, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Template:Reproductive health → Template:Human reproductive health – According to template's content. 195.147.25.84 ( talk) 09:29, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
Stumbled across Sexually active life expectancy and thought perhaps it could benefit from being added to this template? skarz ( talk) 16:56, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi all, this is just a friendly notice that I have just performed a somewhat sizable reorganization of the template, with several new subcategories and the addition of quite a few pages that I thought were necessary and sufficiently high-level. I am open to any and all feedback on these changes! Willmskinner ( talk) 23:42, 20 March 2024 (UTC)