This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
History of Morocco template. |
|
History Template‑class | |||||||
|
Morocco Template‑class | ||||||||||||||
|
Please alter the color scheme of this template. As it stands, small pink text on an intense red background is unreadable.— Perceval 22:54, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
i propose this template:
Part of
a series on the History of Morocco |
---|
Morocco portal |
I don't understand, where is the disagreement here? The only difference, that I can see, between
your version and
the one you reverted is collapsible lists. Is it the collapsibility that you disapprove of?
Although the majority of country history templates seem to be non-collapsed, there is no definite format, Sidebar with collapsible Lists template parameters can be added to any vertical template.
--
Tachfin (
talk) 23:46, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Part of a series on the |
History of Morocco |
---|
|
|
|
|
Morocco portal |
As discussed before, since the consensus seems to be that we have to include collapsible lists to the current template, not to make a "tinkered" template with a bad layout and bad colors, I propose this template to replace the old one.
Note that I merged two sections since they have the same title, making the reader a little bit lost.
Btw, I'm quoting:
I like that you've made the sections collapsible, but why the color change? I think the old style with the "History of Morocco" on top and "This article is part of a series" below was more readable -- Irn ( talk) 12:37, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
I think there is good reason for the collapsibility (...) However, I think that's the only thing I would like to see changed. -- Irn ( talk) 15:25, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Since these users, who gave their opinion, seem to agree that we just need to put collapsible lists, not to change the whole template, I'm editing the template to make it more appropriate, and especially, with a better layout. Omar-Toons ( talk) 01:18, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
the first is by far the finnest. menus are well sized, text is a beauty, colors are simple. and every thing goes well. i'm reinstalling it - Dzlinker ( talk) 16:57, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Why I do not see it? Luciusmaximus ( talk) 00:20, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
So let's pick one.
Dzlinker, please avoid imposing your version as you did
here with a dubious diff summary "let's wait until u get a support" -> You are the one who has to get consensus before imposing "your" version.
You already did that many times on other articles (
Berber people and
Maghreb people) by considering that, since nobody oppose you, then everybody support you... things don't work this way!
Since there is no consensus, the previous version (without collapsible boxes) is the sole accepted one.
Further forcing will be reported to
ANI.
--
Omar-Toons (
talk) 00:39, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
This template is more compact, without non-encyclopedic material and with a map of Morocco which is, imho, more adequate than a coat of arms which exists since 1956 (the template retraces the History to 11th C.) Thanks. 78.251.194.230 ( talk) 01:04, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello,
Prior to any discussion, the template must be reverted to its Aug 8th version, since it is the only stable one, and that no consensus was found for the current version in use, which was imopsed by Dzlinker before seeking for a consensus.
The last proposal is, imho, a good basis to work on, but there are no collapsible lists and I see no problem about the coat of arms since many "History Of" templates use the current coat of arms to illustrate it.
I will work on adding collapsible boxes and I will then make a proposal ; I hope that the IP contributor will be back to discuss it.
Regards,
Omar-Toons ( talk) 20:46, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello,
I was trying to make a new template, based on the one made by the IP contributor ; however I found that there is a big problem: The lists are not automatically expanded while active.
This why I think that a "compact" template without collapsible lists is more appropriate than the current one (which looks really bad), except if anyone can put sth that makes it auto-expanding.
Btw, I'm asking to discuss these changes again since they were made without any consensus, and to have a template based on the Region history template code, as are most "History of" templates on WP: there is a standardized template model for that, we don't have to make a non-standardized one for Morocco ; you can browse all "History of" templates listes, for example, on the Template:History of Europe templates, Template:History of Asia templates, Template:History of Africa templates and Template:History of Oceania templates, curiously only the templates made by Dzlinker don't follow the standard.
Then, any template must be based on the previously cited model of "Region history" templates.
Regards
Omar-Toons (
talk) 10:55, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi!, I eliminate religioso part of template because it`s about history, not "History of Religion in Morocco", and I add another country and cultures that I found it in a book of University of Leiden. Thanks!. 83.36.37.144 ( talk) 14:25, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
So....what's the current status of the template question? There were some good proposals on making it collapsible (which I feel is quite necessary). But a few criticisms here and there, and the whole thing seems to have petered out. I'd still like to see it happen, so any chance of reviving this question and settling on an adequate template? Walrasiad ( talk) 18:14, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
Had better stop, please reach a consensus before further changes. Darkness Shines ( talk) 17:14, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
A consensus was made long time ago about this matter. A hard headed user (OmarToon) is making this difficult for every one.
Extended content Darkness Shines ( talk) 19:50, 21 February 2012 (UTC) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For the reasons below, i think the template should use drop-down menus - Dzlinker ( talk).
Consensus goes here
|
This template gives links to non existing articles. In fact:
Fort-Henry ( talk) 02:25, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
Part of a series on the |
History of Morocco |
---|
Protectorate (1912–1956) |
Related history topics |
Morocco portal |
Hello. Here's a version of the template whose main improvement is a smallest font-size that's readable. If I recall correctly, there's been no change to the layout or what's linked by the template. Or, if there has, it's (very) minor. 213.246.91.158 ( talk) 02:36, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
Hello,
Here's a copy of the template I proposed, then it can be easily accessible to all:
--
Omar-toons (
talk) 11:04, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
Part of a series on the |
History of Morocco |
---|
Morocco portal |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
History of Morocco template. |
|
History Template‑class | |||||||
|
Morocco Template‑class | ||||||||||||||
|
Please alter the color scheme of this template. As it stands, small pink text on an intense red background is unreadable.— Perceval 22:54, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
i propose this template:
Part of
a series on the History of Morocco |
---|
Morocco portal |
I don't understand, where is the disagreement here? The only difference, that I can see, between
your version and
the one you reverted is collapsible lists. Is it the collapsibility that you disapprove of?
Although the majority of country history templates seem to be non-collapsed, there is no definite format, Sidebar with collapsible Lists template parameters can be added to any vertical template.
--
Tachfin (
talk) 23:46, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Part of a series on the |
History of Morocco |
---|
|
|
|
|
Morocco portal |
As discussed before, since the consensus seems to be that we have to include collapsible lists to the current template, not to make a "tinkered" template with a bad layout and bad colors, I propose this template to replace the old one.
Note that I merged two sections since they have the same title, making the reader a little bit lost.
Btw, I'm quoting:
I like that you've made the sections collapsible, but why the color change? I think the old style with the "History of Morocco" on top and "This article is part of a series" below was more readable -- Irn ( talk) 12:37, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
I think there is good reason for the collapsibility (...) However, I think that's the only thing I would like to see changed. -- Irn ( talk) 15:25, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Since these users, who gave their opinion, seem to agree that we just need to put collapsible lists, not to change the whole template, I'm editing the template to make it more appropriate, and especially, with a better layout. Omar-Toons ( talk) 01:18, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
the first is by far the finnest. menus are well sized, text is a beauty, colors are simple. and every thing goes well. i'm reinstalling it - Dzlinker ( talk) 16:57, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Why I do not see it? Luciusmaximus ( talk) 00:20, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
So let's pick one.
Dzlinker, please avoid imposing your version as you did
here with a dubious diff summary "let's wait until u get a support" -> You are the one who has to get consensus before imposing "your" version.
You already did that many times on other articles (
Berber people and
Maghreb people) by considering that, since nobody oppose you, then everybody support you... things don't work this way!
Since there is no consensus, the previous version (without collapsible boxes) is the sole accepted one.
Further forcing will be reported to
ANI.
--
Omar-Toons (
talk) 00:39, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
This template is more compact, without non-encyclopedic material and with a map of Morocco which is, imho, more adequate than a coat of arms which exists since 1956 (the template retraces the History to 11th C.) Thanks. 78.251.194.230 ( talk) 01:04, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello,
Prior to any discussion, the template must be reverted to its Aug 8th version, since it is the only stable one, and that no consensus was found for the current version in use, which was imopsed by Dzlinker before seeking for a consensus.
The last proposal is, imho, a good basis to work on, but there are no collapsible lists and I see no problem about the coat of arms since many "History Of" templates use the current coat of arms to illustrate it.
I will work on adding collapsible boxes and I will then make a proposal ; I hope that the IP contributor will be back to discuss it.
Regards,
Omar-Toons ( talk) 20:46, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello,
I was trying to make a new template, based on the one made by the IP contributor ; however I found that there is a big problem: The lists are not automatically expanded while active.
This why I think that a "compact" template without collapsible lists is more appropriate than the current one (which looks really bad), except if anyone can put sth that makes it auto-expanding.
Btw, I'm asking to discuss these changes again since they were made without any consensus, and to have a template based on the Region history template code, as are most "History of" templates on WP: there is a standardized template model for that, we don't have to make a non-standardized one for Morocco ; you can browse all "History of" templates listes, for example, on the Template:History of Europe templates, Template:History of Asia templates, Template:History of Africa templates and Template:History of Oceania templates, curiously only the templates made by Dzlinker don't follow the standard.
Then, any template must be based on the previously cited model of "Region history" templates.
Regards
Omar-Toons (
talk) 10:55, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi!, I eliminate religioso part of template because it`s about history, not "History of Religion in Morocco", and I add another country and cultures that I found it in a book of University of Leiden. Thanks!. 83.36.37.144 ( talk) 14:25, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
So....what's the current status of the template question? There were some good proposals on making it collapsible (which I feel is quite necessary). But a few criticisms here and there, and the whole thing seems to have petered out. I'd still like to see it happen, so any chance of reviving this question and settling on an adequate template? Walrasiad ( talk) 18:14, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
Had better stop, please reach a consensus before further changes. Darkness Shines ( talk) 17:14, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
A consensus was made long time ago about this matter. A hard headed user (OmarToon) is making this difficult for every one.
Extended content Darkness Shines ( talk) 19:50, 21 February 2012 (UTC) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For the reasons below, i think the template should use drop-down menus - Dzlinker ( talk).
Consensus goes here
|
This template gives links to non existing articles. In fact:
Fort-Henry ( talk) 02:25, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
Part of a series on the |
History of Morocco |
---|
Protectorate (1912–1956) |
Related history topics |
Morocco portal |
Hello. Here's a version of the template whose main improvement is a smallest font-size that's readable. If I recall correctly, there's been no change to the layout or what's linked by the template. Or, if there has, it's (very) minor. 213.246.91.158 ( talk) 02:36, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
Hello,
Here's a copy of the template I proposed, then it can be easily accessible to all:
--
Omar-toons (
talk) 11:04, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
Part of a series on the |
History of Morocco |
---|
Morocco portal |