California Template‑class | |||||||
|
Can we choose a colour combination that doesn't burn my eyes as harshly? -- Wafulz 02:16, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Why isn't Sacramento on this template? Also, why is this locked? -- Indolences 06:24, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Please limit the city links on this sidebar to the four most populous cities (Los Angeles, San Diego, San Jose and San Francisco) and the capital (Sacramento). Others can go in History of California. There isn't room (or need) for all the cities in the sidebar. Ikluft ( talk) 06:28, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
I recently switched template:Texas History to be based on template:Region history. Ideally it would be nice for all the state history infoboxes to be based off the same base template in order to gain some consistency.
Would anybody be opposed to doing something like the following?
Part of a series on the |
History of California |
---|
Timeline |
To 1899 |
Gold Rush (1848) |
US Civil War (1861-1865) |
Since 1900 |
Topics |
Missions · Californio · Maritime · California Trail · Gold Rush · Women · Central Pacific · Railroad |
Highways · Telegraph |
Cities |
San Diego · Monterey · San Francisco · San Jose |
Los Angeles · Sacramento · |
California portal |
-- Mcorazao ( talk) 14:18, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
I see a number of cities have been added, several of which are (no offense intended) not that important in the grand scheme of California history. Earlier it was asked to keep the sidebar list to the four largest cities and the state capital, which makes sense from both a population and a historical perspective. While some other smaller cities may have had significant historical impact on California (say, Monterey, Santa Barbara, etc.) if we start to open this up we're going to end up in a pissing contest of cities. I'll wait a couple of days for response and then revert it back if there are no reasonable objections. Dtcomposer ( talk) 03:34, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
California Template‑class | |||||||
|
Can we choose a colour combination that doesn't burn my eyes as harshly? -- Wafulz 02:16, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Why isn't Sacramento on this template? Also, why is this locked? -- Indolences 06:24, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Please limit the city links on this sidebar to the four most populous cities (Los Angeles, San Diego, San Jose and San Francisco) and the capital (Sacramento). Others can go in History of California. There isn't room (or need) for all the cities in the sidebar. Ikluft ( talk) 06:28, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
I recently switched template:Texas History to be based on template:Region history. Ideally it would be nice for all the state history infoboxes to be based off the same base template in order to gain some consistency.
Would anybody be opposed to doing something like the following?
Part of a series on the |
History of California |
---|
Timeline |
To 1899 |
Gold Rush (1848) |
US Civil War (1861-1865) |
Since 1900 |
Topics |
Missions · Californio · Maritime · California Trail · Gold Rush · Women · Central Pacific · Railroad |
Highways · Telegraph |
Cities |
San Diego · Monterey · San Francisco · San Jose |
Los Angeles · Sacramento · |
California portal |
-- Mcorazao ( talk) 14:18, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
I see a number of cities have been added, several of which are (no offense intended) not that important in the grand scheme of California history. Earlier it was asked to keep the sidebar list to the four largest cities and the state capital, which makes sense from both a population and a historical perspective. While some other smaller cities may have had significant historical impact on California (say, Monterey, Santa Barbara, etc.) if we start to open this up we're going to end up in a pissing contest of cities. I'll wait a couple of days for response and then revert it back if there are no reasonable objections. Dtcomposer ( talk) 03:34, 25 November 2012 (UTC)