Would any of these be worth adding?

• Breitbart.com
• 8chan
• Reddit

Just some thoughts. Zero Serenity ^{( talk - contributions)} 15:50, 12 April 2016 (UTC) reply

Breitbart.com (which I think you meant to link to) doesn't actually mention Gamergate except in the title of one of its references – I think it's enough to include Milo Yiannopoulos. Reddit has a twelve-paragraph "controversies" section, only one of which is dedicated to Gamergate, so that's probably too tenous as well. 8chan seems like a good addition, though – a good rule of thumb would be to consider articles that mention Gamergate in the lead section, or at least have a heading dedicated to it. Adam Baldwin is one fringe case I can think of. — Flax5 18:43, 12 April 2016 (UTC) reply

That's essentially the "sanity check" that I was using - 'Does the target article have a significant section relating to Gamergate?' - based on the discussion above, I think we can easily add 8chan. - Ryk72 ^'c.s.n.s.' 19:37, 12 April 2016 (UTC) reply

So this subsection is probably not a finite enough anchor. Zero Serenity ^{( talk - contributions)} 20:14, 12 April 2016 (UTC) reply