This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
please add Chinese-Ukrainian relations], Chinese-Georgian relations. 218.102.206.23 ( talk) 15:15, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: template not moved. Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 20:20, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Template:Foreign relations of the People's Republic of China → Template:Foreign relations of China – This would allow for consistency with the corresponding nation-state article, which has been moved to China. Template:Foreign relations of China is currently a redirect to this article. Just plain "China" can be considered official for international relations as it is the country's UN member name. See also the "China". The World Factbook (2024 ed.). Central Intelligence Agency.. Kauffner ( talk) 23:33, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Foreign relations of the People's Republic of China - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RM bot 01:00, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
There really isn't too much content in this template, using collapsible groups simply makes the template highly unusable. SilAshkenazi ( talk) 02:34, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Someone add these bilateral relations. They just recently got back in contact as trade partners. I have sources if you need them. Sereniama ( talk) 06:29, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Cross-strait relationship is dedicate to be defied as foreign relations, since both authority see the territory of the others as their own and offically not give up the one-china policy, so i follow the pattern of Template:Foreign relations of Serbia, Template:Foreign relations of Kosovo, Template:Foreign relations of Cyprus to move the Cross-Strait Relationship to a new "dispute" row, as Kosovo–Serbia relations shown on the Serbian template. But it was reverted by user:Uaat without any explanation. So, i would like to ask why can not Taiwan be move to the dispute row, since the Relationship IS dispute. Jiangyu911 ( talk) 03:38, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
@ NYCT192 and WikiCleanerMan: Please stop edit-warring and discuss the issue here on the talk page. — Mx. Granger ( talk · contribs) 14:14, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
please add Chinese-Ukrainian relations], Chinese-Georgian relations. 218.102.206.23 ( talk) 15:15, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: template not moved. Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 20:20, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Template:Foreign relations of the People's Republic of China → Template:Foreign relations of China – This would allow for consistency with the corresponding nation-state article, which has been moved to China. Template:Foreign relations of China is currently a redirect to this article. Just plain "China" can be considered official for international relations as it is the country's UN member name. See also the "China". The World Factbook (2024 ed.). Central Intelligence Agency.. Kauffner ( talk) 23:33, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Foreign relations of the People's Republic of China - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RM bot 01:00, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
There really isn't too much content in this template, using collapsible groups simply makes the template highly unusable. SilAshkenazi ( talk) 02:34, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Someone add these bilateral relations. They just recently got back in contact as trade partners. I have sources if you need them. Sereniama ( talk) 06:29, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Cross-strait relationship is dedicate to be defied as foreign relations, since both authority see the territory of the others as their own and offically not give up the one-china policy, so i follow the pattern of Template:Foreign relations of Serbia, Template:Foreign relations of Kosovo, Template:Foreign relations of Cyprus to move the Cross-Strait Relationship to a new "dispute" row, as Kosovo–Serbia relations shown on the Serbian template. But it was reverted by user:Uaat without any explanation. So, i would like to ask why can not Taiwan be move to the dispute row, since the Relationship IS dispute. Jiangyu911 ( talk) 03:38, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
@ NYCT192 and WikiCleanerMan: Please stop edit-warring and discuss the issue here on the talk page. — Mx. Granger ( talk · contribs) 14:14, 10 July 2023 (UTC)