Football: Brazil Template‑class

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. This template is supported by the Brazilian football task force.

Brazil: Sports Template‑class

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. This template is supported by the Sports in Brazil task force.

Shouldn't there be two navigational boxes, one for Men's football in Brazil and one for Women's football in Brazil? My reasoning for this is that in many articles the Football in Brazil template is added in collapsed state, and within it there are two collapsed sections, which makes it unpractical. The user must uncollapse two times to access any page linked within it. Separate templates are fairly common in navigational boxes for other countries's football with enough articles to justify them (which is also the case in Women's football in Brazil):

• Template:Football in Germany, Template:Women's football in Germany;
• Template:Football in Scotland, Template:Women's Football in Scotland;
• Template:Football in Scotland, Template:Women's football in Scotland;
• Template:Football in England, Template:Women's football in England;
• Template:Football in South Korea, Template:Women's football in South Korea

Felipe Bini ( talk) 20:48, 7 October 2015 (UTC) reply