China Template‑class | |||||||
|
Conservatism Template‑class | |||||||
|
This template may suffer from WP:OR issues because some of its entries do not speak about conservatism at all. An obvious example is Want Want. The only reason I can imagine is that they have been accused of having close links to the Chinese Communist Party, as stated in the article, but that means the reader has to make the leap from the assertion that the Chinese Communist Party is conservative, therefore cooperating with them makes you conservative. Yue 🌙 01:38, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
It is unfair to remove articles related to this from the template. Wang Huning claimed himself to be a conservative or neo-authoritarian, and had an important influence on China's ideological history. In addition, there are scholars who describe the Chinese Communist Party as "conservative." These are not WP:OR. ProKMT ( talk) 11:54, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
It could be WP:SYNTH that equates the two. Opposing the Chinese Communist Party does not necessarily mean they are conservatives.
Advocating for capitalism and liberal democracy does not mean conservatism. In Chinese Wikipedia, articles relating to the Chinese Communist Party (since the 1990s) are linked to conservatism, but anti-communist liberals are not linked to conservatives. ProKMT ( talk) 12:00, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
I think it's better to use Qing China Dragon than KMT Emblem. Chinese Wikipedia often uses China Dragon images in Templates related to 'China' in a context that includes both ROC and PRC. ProKMT ( talk) 07:44, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
For an article to be considered part of a series in conservatism in China, it should have high-quality sources and contextual support for that claim. Going through Conservatism in China, most of the linked articles barely mention conservatism, or mention it only after ProKMT's recent edits. This raises serious concerns about Wikipedia:No original research. Vacosea ( talk) 23:33, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
China Template‑class | |||||||
|
Conservatism Template‑class | |||||||
|
This template may suffer from WP:OR issues because some of its entries do not speak about conservatism at all. An obvious example is Want Want. The only reason I can imagine is that they have been accused of having close links to the Chinese Communist Party, as stated in the article, but that means the reader has to make the leap from the assertion that the Chinese Communist Party is conservative, therefore cooperating with them makes you conservative. Yue 🌙 01:38, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
It is unfair to remove articles related to this from the template. Wang Huning claimed himself to be a conservative or neo-authoritarian, and had an important influence on China's ideological history. In addition, there are scholars who describe the Chinese Communist Party as "conservative." These are not WP:OR. ProKMT ( talk) 11:54, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
It could be WP:SYNTH that equates the two. Opposing the Chinese Communist Party does not necessarily mean they are conservatives.
Advocating for capitalism and liberal democracy does not mean conservatism. In Chinese Wikipedia, articles relating to the Chinese Communist Party (since the 1990s) are linked to conservatism, but anti-communist liberals are not linked to conservatives. ProKMT ( talk) 12:00, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
I think it's better to use Qing China Dragon than KMT Emblem. Chinese Wikipedia often uses China Dragon images in Templates related to 'China' in a context that includes both ROC and PRC. ProKMT ( talk) 07:44, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
For an article to be considered part of a series in conservatism in China, it should have high-quality sources and contextual support for that claim. Going through Conservatism in China, most of the linked articles barely mention conservatism, or mention it only after ProKMT's recent edits. This raises serious concerns about Wikipedia:No original research. Vacosea ( talk) 23:33, 14 April 2024 (UTC)