Stub sorting

This template is maintained by WikiProject Stub sorting, an attempt to bring some sort of order to Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to improve/expand the articles containing this stub notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Stub sortingWikipedia:WikiProject Stub sortingTemplate:WikiProject Stub sortingStub sorting articles

Christianity Template‑class

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Does anyone think this template would look better with a pixture? The fish, Image:Ichthus.svg, from {{christianity-stub}} could work. Blarneytherinosaur talk 08:40, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply

It adds some talk about Roman Catholicism, which looks really odd on a page supposedly about another church. It also adds a second ref line. I deleted it from the Congregational Union of Australia page and put it up for discussion on Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2013 March 22. Aarghdvaark ( talk) 02:42, 22 March 2013 (UTC) reply

No, it doesn't add anything about Roman Catholicism. I'm not sure what you're seeing, but I'm not. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:49, 22 March 2013 (UTC) reply

I spotted the problem at 05:37, 21 March 2013‎ and changed the Congregational Union of Australia page then. The problem was fixed by Johnmperry 11:10, 21 March 2013‎. [1] So you wouldn't have seen a problem. I've reinstated the stub in Congregational Union of Australia. Aarghdvaark ( talk) 04:41, 22 March 2013 (UTC) reply

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please remove

<noinclude>
{{pp-template}}
</noinclude>

since protection levels are automatically sensed by {{ asbox}}, which adds the necessary protection category and template. See, eg, Template:Law-firm-stub or Template:Law-stub. Thanks, -- DannyS712 ( talk) 20:34, 13 May 2019 (UTC) reply

 Not done but @ DannyS712: the protection level has been reduced, so you can edit directly. — xaosflux ^Talk 22:17, 13 May 2019 (UTC) reply