Chemistry Template‑class | |||||||
|
How exactly do you decide whether a bond type is "core organic", "many uses", or "academic"? I would call CF, CI, and CS (and maybe CP) "core organic", and I would call CFe "many uses". -- Itub 08:58, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
background color was changed to be more appealing. Ktsquare (talk) 20:31, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
for the lanthanides that Ln-C bonds are known? Nergaal ( talk) 21:57, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
The links should direct with the actual title pages. In this way the C-Cd bond in the template on the Organocadmium compound page will appear in bold without a hyperlink (no need to because you are already on the organocadmium compound page). Is it possible to revert the reversal of my last edit? Thanks in advance V8rik ( talk) 17:33, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
MgC should really link to Group 2 organometallic chemistry and not to Grignards. Try to look at the bigger picture. Is it possible to revert the reversal of my last edit? Thanks in advance V8rik ( talk) 17:35, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
I've changed the coloring on this; I believe tetra-ethyl-lead is still being used in aviation (propeller craft) fuel, additionally it is still be manufactured. Apparently "Guiyang Yifeng Fine Chemical Co., Ltd" in - where else, right? - China is the world's leading supplier of the stuff, and markets it for use in cars as well as aircraft... Zaphraud ( talk) 17:15, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
Please consult Wikipedia:Edit warring and specifically the The three-revert rule V8rik ( talk) 22:23, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
The current classification "Bond unknown" used to be called "Bond unknown / not assessed". If you are certain a bond does not exist please provide proper citations otherwise "Bond unknown / not assessed" is safer V8rik ( talk) 22:18, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
I'd argue that CMg and CLi are core organic chemistry, because they are very useful in synthesising organic compounds (perhaps the first thing you learn to do with them is making C–C bonds). I might also argue for promotion of CB, CSi, and CP. Double sharp ( talk) 15:45, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
I'm working to cnange this one into a WP:NAVBOX. - DePiep ( talk) 16:52, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
If the template is called ChemicalBondsToCarbon why half of the pages link to E-C bond and the other half to the respectfull organoelemental chemistry page? 𝕍𝕀𝕜𝕥𝕠𝕣 𝕐𝕒𝕟𝕖𝕧 ( talk) 14:35, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Chemistry Template‑class | |||||||
|
How exactly do you decide whether a bond type is "core organic", "many uses", or "academic"? I would call CF, CI, and CS (and maybe CP) "core organic", and I would call CFe "many uses". -- Itub 08:58, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
background color was changed to be more appealing. Ktsquare (talk) 20:31, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
for the lanthanides that Ln-C bonds are known? Nergaal ( talk) 21:57, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
The links should direct with the actual title pages. In this way the C-Cd bond in the template on the Organocadmium compound page will appear in bold without a hyperlink (no need to because you are already on the organocadmium compound page). Is it possible to revert the reversal of my last edit? Thanks in advance V8rik ( talk) 17:33, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
MgC should really link to Group 2 organometallic chemistry and not to Grignards. Try to look at the bigger picture. Is it possible to revert the reversal of my last edit? Thanks in advance V8rik ( talk) 17:35, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
I've changed the coloring on this; I believe tetra-ethyl-lead is still being used in aviation (propeller craft) fuel, additionally it is still be manufactured. Apparently "Guiyang Yifeng Fine Chemical Co., Ltd" in - where else, right? - China is the world's leading supplier of the stuff, and markets it for use in cars as well as aircraft... Zaphraud ( talk) 17:15, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
Please consult Wikipedia:Edit warring and specifically the The three-revert rule V8rik ( talk) 22:23, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
The current classification "Bond unknown" used to be called "Bond unknown / not assessed". If you are certain a bond does not exist please provide proper citations otherwise "Bond unknown / not assessed" is safer V8rik ( talk) 22:18, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
I'd argue that CMg and CLi are core organic chemistry, because they are very useful in synthesising organic compounds (perhaps the first thing you learn to do with them is making C–C bonds). I might also argue for promotion of CB, CSi, and CP. Double sharp ( talk) 15:45, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
I'm working to cnange this one into a WP:NAVBOX. - DePiep ( talk) 16:52, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
If the template is called ChemicalBondsToCarbon why half of the pages link to E-C bond and the other half to the respectfull organoelemental chemistry page? 𝕍𝕀𝕜𝕥𝕠𝕣 𝕐𝕒𝕟𝕖𝕧 ( talk) 14:35, 17 December 2021 (UTC)