This template is within the scope of WikiProject Morocco, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Morocco on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MoroccoWikipedia:WikiProject MoroccoTemplate:WikiProject MoroccoMorocco articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
This template is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
Why, Morroco is always every country?, Morocco is only with the curent dynasty. Morocco is a sunni country, not are shia country, and there is not any kind of sequence beethwen Idrisid (shia, but le legal sucessor was Hammunidid dynasty), later was Almoravids (the legal sucessor is Banu Ganiyah)..... — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
89.131.21.173 (
talk) 19:26, 22 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Completely agree. This template should be renamed to Spanish-North African conflicts or something similar
Stoni (
talk) 13:03, 9 April 2022 (UTC)reply
What is the "Second Reconquista"??
To begin with, the term "Reconquista" is agreed by most scholars nowadays to be a fake and historically unaccurate term in terms of the conflict that ended in 1492 with the dissolution of the Nazari dynasty in Granada. This would anyways be the "first" reconquista.
Now, "Second Reconquista"??? I as a Spaniard living in Spain since my birth have never ever heard such a term neither in Spanish nor in English, even when studying the events of the time. No source cites these wars as part of a supposed "second" reconquering. Therefore, I have supplanted the term with "Spanish wars on Morocco" because that's what they were, invasions carried out with the least provocation from Morocco.
This is my bibliography:
https://elpais.com/elpais/2019/04/11/hechos/1554980000_022524.html,https://www.diariodeburgos.es/noticia/ZD86B418D-DD64-5400-8FBA1220E9A23524/20131102/reconquista/es/mito,https://historicodigital.com/la-falsa-reconquista.html,ad I could gather many more. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Maravjua (
talk •
contribs) 11:11, 25 April 2019 (UTC)reply
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Morocco, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Morocco on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MoroccoWikipedia:WikiProject MoroccoTemplate:WikiProject MoroccoMorocco articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
This template is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
Why, Morroco is always every country?, Morocco is only with the curent dynasty. Morocco is a sunni country, not are shia country, and there is not any kind of sequence beethwen Idrisid (shia, but le legal sucessor was Hammunidid dynasty), later was Almoravids (the legal sucessor is Banu Ganiyah)..... — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
89.131.21.173 (
talk) 19:26, 22 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Completely agree. This template should be renamed to Spanish-North African conflicts or something similar
Stoni (
talk) 13:03, 9 April 2022 (UTC)reply
What is the "Second Reconquista"??
To begin with, the term "Reconquista" is agreed by most scholars nowadays to be a fake and historically unaccurate term in terms of the conflict that ended in 1492 with the dissolution of the Nazari dynasty in Granada. This would anyways be the "first" reconquista.
Now, "Second Reconquista"??? I as a Spaniard living in Spain since my birth have never ever heard such a term neither in Spanish nor in English, even when studying the events of the time. No source cites these wars as part of a supposed "second" reconquering. Therefore, I have supplanted the term with "Spanish wars on Morocco" because that's what they were, invasions carried out with the least provocation from Morocco.
This is my bibliography:
https://elpais.com/elpais/2019/04/11/hechos/1554980000_022524.html,https://www.diariodeburgos.es/noticia/ZD86B418D-DD64-5400-8FBA1220E9A23524/20131102/reconquista/es/mito,https://historicodigital.com/la-falsa-reconquista.html,ad I could gather many more. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Maravjua (
talk •
contribs) 11:11, 25 April 2019 (UTC)reply