Antarctica Template‑class | |||||||
|
Brazil doesn't actually make a claim on Antarctica. And where is the evidence that South Africa did? Astrotrain 23:50, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
I added these things in 3 different edits, so that you don't revert all at once and only the appropriate. Reasons for add - in changes history. Alinor 13:41, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
I can find no evidence of any South African claim. I can find no evidence of any Brazilian claim, until such evidence is found, and actual articles exist for these claims- they can't appear on the template. The possibilities of such claims cannot be discussed in a template. Astrotrain 17:37, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
===>There are references and an article The template links to the Brazilian article. What more do you need? - Justin (koavf), talk 23:17, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
===>Why should this template be different than the article? If the article mentions Brazil's Zone of Interest, why wouldn't this template? - Justin (koavf), talk 18:39, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
===>That's funny I put "Brazil Antarctica 'Zone of Interest'" into Yahoo! and found the following resources:
Do you need an article from the Academic Journal of Antartic Geopolitical Studies or something? - Justin (koavf), talk 01:39, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
Whatever these unreputable websites state:
Astrotrain 15:55, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
I wasn't aware that Sweden had made territorial claims in Antarctica. Can anyone provide documentation for this? -- Nidator T / C 11:18, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
Its actually Norway. It's called Queen Maud Land.-- 76.88.243.13 ( talk) 15:12, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
As Australia has the various named territories included in this template under the main Australian Antarctic Territory article, I have added Queen Elizabeth Land under the British Antarctic Territory article. Dunarc ( talk) 21:45, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Antarctica Template‑class | |||||||
|
Brazil doesn't actually make a claim on Antarctica. And where is the evidence that South Africa did? Astrotrain 23:50, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
I added these things in 3 different edits, so that you don't revert all at once and only the appropriate. Reasons for add - in changes history. Alinor 13:41, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
I can find no evidence of any South African claim. I can find no evidence of any Brazilian claim, until such evidence is found, and actual articles exist for these claims- they can't appear on the template. The possibilities of such claims cannot be discussed in a template. Astrotrain 17:37, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
===>There are references and an article The template links to the Brazilian article. What more do you need? - Justin (koavf), talk 23:17, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
===>Why should this template be different than the article? If the article mentions Brazil's Zone of Interest, why wouldn't this template? - Justin (koavf), talk 18:39, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
===>That's funny I put "Brazil Antarctica 'Zone of Interest'" into Yahoo! and found the following resources:
Do you need an article from the Academic Journal of Antartic Geopolitical Studies or something? - Justin (koavf), talk 01:39, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
Whatever these unreputable websites state:
Astrotrain 15:55, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
I wasn't aware that Sweden had made territorial claims in Antarctica. Can anyone provide documentation for this? -- Nidator T / C 11:18, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
Its actually Norway. It's called Queen Maud Land.-- 76.88.243.13 ( talk) 15:12, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
As Australia has the various named territories included in this template under the main Australian Antarctic Territory article, I have added Queen Elizabeth Land under the British Antarctic Territory article. Dunarc ( talk) 21:45, 22 November 2020 (UTC)