This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This template combined Template:US ANG by state ( version as of copy), Template:Wings of the Air National Guard ( version), Template:Squadrons of the Air National Guard ( version), Template:Non-Flying units of the ANG ( version). The other templates will be changed to redirects once all instances have been replaced. bahamut0013 ♠ ♣ 23:11, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
copied from respective user talk pages
I saw that you undid my edit to Template:Air National Guard. Unfortunately, in doing so, you restored a link to the disambiguation page National Guard. Links to disambiguation pages are strongly discouraged. If you think Militia (United States) is not the best link in this context, can you suggest another that is not to a disambiguation page? -- Russ (talk) 15:04, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
It appears that Bahamut0013 reverted my Oct. 17 edit without even reading it, as it was materially different than the previous attempt at disambiguation. Before reverting again, please explain exactly why you believe a link to National Guard would be more helpful to readers on this template than a link to National Guard (United States). Of course, in order to do this, you will have to actually follow those two links and compare and contrast what is on the respective pages. -- Russ (talk) 20:21, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
I can see why we need this template but there is no need to make a parent template and many other little templates within it. There were separate ones for a reason. The only reason that I made the many templates was because I wanted to cover the ANG more than the USAF was being covered in concern to these page. Each page now has over 300 other pages linking to it, which is really ridiculous. This template would be better off split because I have never seen a template where it subdivides into other sub-templates. Kevin Rutherford ( talk) 01:32, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
I was cleaning up some stub articles and came across 209th Civil Engineer Squadron, which appears to be an ANG squadron, but is not listed in this template. I thought someone here might be interested to know about it. Lyrl Talk C 13:58, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This template combined Template:US ANG by state ( version as of copy), Template:Wings of the Air National Guard ( version), Template:Squadrons of the Air National Guard ( version), Template:Non-Flying units of the ANG ( version). The other templates will be changed to redirects once all instances have been replaced. bahamut0013 ♠ ♣ 23:11, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
copied from respective user talk pages
I saw that you undid my edit to Template:Air National Guard. Unfortunately, in doing so, you restored a link to the disambiguation page National Guard. Links to disambiguation pages are strongly discouraged. If you think Militia (United States) is not the best link in this context, can you suggest another that is not to a disambiguation page? -- Russ (talk) 15:04, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
It appears that Bahamut0013 reverted my Oct. 17 edit without even reading it, as it was materially different than the previous attempt at disambiguation. Before reverting again, please explain exactly why you believe a link to National Guard would be more helpful to readers on this template than a link to National Guard (United States). Of course, in order to do this, you will have to actually follow those two links and compare and contrast what is on the respective pages. -- Russ (talk) 20:21, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
I can see why we need this template but there is no need to make a parent template and many other little templates within it. There were separate ones for a reason. The only reason that I made the many templates was because I wanted to cover the ANG more than the USAF was being covered in concern to these page. Each page now has over 300 other pages linking to it, which is really ridiculous. This template would be better off split because I have never seen a template where it subdivides into other sub-templates. Kevin Rutherford ( talk) 01:32, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
I was cleaning up some stub articles and came across 209th Civil Engineer Squadron, which appears to be an ANG squadron, but is not listed in this template. I thought someone here might be interested to know about it. Lyrl Talk C 13:58, 4 August 2009 (UTC)