This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Just created a template for ease of navigation, esp for those unfamiliar to the series. I know it's not all that pretty yet but this is my first Template and any help with polish would be greatly appreciated. NeoFreak 16:35, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
Am I the only one that thinks the new template color is really jarring and doesn't fit in with the articles? If so I'll leave it be but otherwise I'm reverting it. NeoFreak 00:54, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
We should not be linking to the family tree templates from this navigation box. We need to be keeping our readers within mainspace. Directing them away from mainspace causes WP:SURPRISE/ WP:EGG issues and doesn't allow for full WP:BIDIRECTIONALity. I believe all the tree templates are included at other articles linked from here, so there's no need to have them linked twice. In fact, I think there's probably a case to delete these single use templates after substitution. -- Rob Sinden ( talk) 14:23, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
I've begun a discussion on this here. Thanks.— TAnthony Talk 22:20, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Just created a template for ease of navigation, esp for those unfamiliar to the series. I know it's not all that pretty yet but this is my first Template and any help with polish would be greatly appreciated. NeoFreak 16:35, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
Am I the only one that thinks the new template color is really jarring and doesn't fit in with the articles? If so I'll leave it be but otherwise I'm reverting it. NeoFreak 00:54, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
We should not be linking to the family tree templates from this navigation box. We need to be keeping our readers within mainspace. Directing them away from mainspace causes WP:SURPRISE/ WP:EGG issues and doesn't allow for full WP:BIDIRECTIONALity. I believe all the tree templates are included at other articles linked from here, so there's no need to have them linked twice. In fact, I think there's probably a case to delete these single use templates after substitution. -- Rob Sinden ( talk) 14:23, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
I've begun a discussion on this here. Thanks.— TAnthony Talk 22:20, 20 June 2019 (UTC)