This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
An editor recently added Rocky De La Fuente as a Republican candidate, and I reverted. I believe that fringe candidates should not be included in this navbox, unless and until their campaign receives substantial RS attention. Same reasoning for Democratic "vanity" candidates such as Michael E. Arth: apparently there are 275 of them… — JFG talk 20:38, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
There are a nunber of articles on topics closely tied to this election and that take up a large part in current coverage of the election, yet are kinda orphaned when it comes to being included in this template. Hence, I suggest their inclusion:
I'm not sure about Stop the Steal. Our main article 2020 United States presidential election seems to be linking it as the main article for the protests and fraud allegations, however it's just an article about the FB group and its direct successors there, whereas the actual main articles are Alleged irregularities in the 2020 United States Presidential election and 2020 United States election protests. -- 2003:EF:1703:A520:C1EE:9164:F84C:14D6 ( talk) 13:52, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
The way the additional parties that supported Biden (Independent Party Working, Families Party) and Trump (Conservative Party, Right to Life Party) makes it appear that the primaries for the Democratic and Republican parties, respectively, involved these parties, which they did not. Perhaps find a different manner of including them in the infobox, or exclude them altogether. But the current manner they are included is pretty problematic. SecretName101 ( talk) 21:18, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
An editor recently added Rocky De La Fuente as a Republican candidate, and I reverted. I believe that fringe candidates should not be included in this navbox, unless and until their campaign receives substantial RS attention. Same reasoning for Democratic "vanity" candidates such as Michael E. Arth: apparently there are 275 of them… — JFG talk 20:38, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
There are a nunber of articles on topics closely tied to this election and that take up a large part in current coverage of the election, yet are kinda orphaned when it comes to being included in this template. Hence, I suggest their inclusion:
I'm not sure about Stop the Steal. Our main article 2020 United States presidential election seems to be linking it as the main article for the protests and fraud allegations, however it's just an article about the FB group and its direct successors there, whereas the actual main articles are Alleged irregularities in the 2020 United States Presidential election and 2020 United States election protests. -- 2003:EF:1703:A520:C1EE:9164:F84C:14D6 ( talk) 13:52, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
The way the additional parties that supported Biden (Independent Party Working, Families Party) and Trump (Conservative Party, Right to Life Party) makes it appear that the primaries for the Democratic and Republican parties, respectively, involved these parties, which they did not. Perhaps find a different manner of including them in the infobox, or exclude them altogether. But the current manner they are included is pretty problematic. SecretName101 ( talk) 21:18, 26 February 2021 (UTC)