![]() | Denmark Template‑class | ||||||
|
To be placed at the top of the talk page of any article relating to Denmark on Wikipedia.
Perhaps this could be the template with ratings incorporated?
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sdorrance ( talk • contribs)
The template looks fantastic now Valentinian, thanks for all your help! -
Sam
18:49, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
The template is very tall compared to other wikiproject templates. I think it would look a lot better with less text. Take a look at the swedish template, they have moved the (FAQ) notice up to the first paragraph, making the class box more compact.
Also you can make the text "Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article." shorter. Carewolf 15:59, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Why not include the portal box as other templates do (i.e. Template:WikiProject Sweden)? -- Ysangkok ( talk) 23:41, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
{{ editprotected}}
Could the documentation be moved to a subpage and the {{ documentation}} template used.
Thanks -- WOSlinker ( talk) 20:25, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Would it be possible to change the location of where articles are place from
Category:Denmark articles needing images where there are only few in the list to
Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Denmark which is a syntax more in common with most photo requests?
Traveler100 (
talk)
09:40, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
{{
editprotected}}
This is a new logo I have made and would like to be used. Please add your comments and if you are for changing it. Cheers! ( Ice Explorer ( talk) 12:56, 9 December 2009 (UTC))
I'm suggesting we change the logo to the SVG version. Compared to the current image, the SVG is smaller in size and more consistent with the logos of other countries' WikiProjects (see File:WikiProject-Iceland-Logo.svg, File:WikiProject-Faroe Islands-Logo.svg, File:WikiProject-Aland Islands-Logo.svg, File:WikiProject-Finland-Logo.svg) - Iketsi ( talk) 13:19, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I suggest to add:
MAIN_CAT=WikiProject Denmark articles
It will make it easier to track the articles (lots of project has this parameter. Christian75 ( talk) 12:52, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
Why does this banner not support the redirect class? Sam Sailor 08:27, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
|QUALITY_SCALE=
parameter has not been set, so the
standard quality scale is used - which does not include redirect. --
Redrose64 🌹 (
talk)
18:36, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
|class=NA
? The "upgrade" to include the redirect class would be inline or with |QUALITY_SCALE=subpage
and {{
WikiProject Denmark/class}}, right? When do projects consider that?
Sam
Sailor
19:47, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
|class=
blank - or omit the parameter. Whichever you do, it will auto-set to NA (and categorise in
Category:NA-Class Denmark articles); I can think of two advantages to doing this instead of explicitly setting |class=na
:
{{
WPBannerMeta}}
to include Redirect in the standard and extended quality scales. Since that one isn't likely to succeed, the thing to do is to obtain consensus at
WT:WikiProject Denmark. Then it becomes a choice of inline or subpage - for a template like this, with no taskforces and no non-standard categorisation, inline is simplest: this line |class={{{class|}}}
|QUALITY_SCALE=inline
|class={{class mask|{{{class|}}}|redirect=yes}}
|class=
set to any explicit value. --
Redrose64 🌹 (
talk)
22:49, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Can you add
|QUALITY_SCALE = extended
underneath the |IMAGE_LEFT_LARGE = 50px.
The redirect
Template:Wikiproject Denmark has been listed at
redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the
redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 9 § Template:Wikiproject Denmark until a consensus is reached.
Estopedist1 (
talk)
06:29, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
![]() | Denmark Template‑class | ||||||
|
To be placed at the top of the talk page of any article relating to Denmark on Wikipedia.
Perhaps this could be the template with ratings incorporated?
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sdorrance ( talk • contribs)
The template looks fantastic now Valentinian, thanks for all your help! -
Sam
18:49, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
The template is very tall compared to other wikiproject templates. I think it would look a lot better with less text. Take a look at the swedish template, they have moved the (FAQ) notice up to the first paragraph, making the class box more compact.
Also you can make the text "Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article." shorter. Carewolf 15:59, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Why not include the portal box as other templates do (i.e. Template:WikiProject Sweden)? -- Ysangkok ( talk) 23:41, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
{{ editprotected}}
Could the documentation be moved to a subpage and the {{ documentation}} template used.
Thanks -- WOSlinker ( talk) 20:25, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Would it be possible to change the location of where articles are place from
Category:Denmark articles needing images where there are only few in the list to
Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Denmark which is a syntax more in common with most photo requests?
Traveler100 (
talk)
09:40, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
{{
editprotected}}
This is a new logo I have made and would like to be used. Please add your comments and if you are for changing it. Cheers! ( Ice Explorer ( talk) 12:56, 9 December 2009 (UTC))
I'm suggesting we change the logo to the SVG version. Compared to the current image, the SVG is smaller in size and more consistent with the logos of other countries' WikiProjects (see File:WikiProject-Iceland-Logo.svg, File:WikiProject-Faroe Islands-Logo.svg, File:WikiProject-Aland Islands-Logo.svg, File:WikiProject-Finland-Logo.svg) - Iketsi ( talk) 13:19, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I suggest to add:
MAIN_CAT=WikiProject Denmark articles
It will make it easier to track the articles (lots of project has this parameter. Christian75 ( talk) 12:52, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
Why does this banner not support the redirect class? Sam Sailor 08:27, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
|QUALITY_SCALE=
parameter has not been set, so the
standard quality scale is used - which does not include redirect. --
Redrose64 🌹 (
talk)
18:36, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
|class=NA
? The "upgrade" to include the redirect class would be inline or with |QUALITY_SCALE=subpage
and {{
WikiProject Denmark/class}}, right? When do projects consider that?
Sam
Sailor
19:47, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
|class=
blank - or omit the parameter. Whichever you do, it will auto-set to NA (and categorise in
Category:NA-Class Denmark articles); I can think of two advantages to doing this instead of explicitly setting |class=na
:
{{
WPBannerMeta}}
to include Redirect in the standard and extended quality scales. Since that one isn't likely to succeed, the thing to do is to obtain consensus at
WT:WikiProject Denmark. Then it becomes a choice of inline or subpage - for a template like this, with no taskforces and no non-standard categorisation, inline is simplest: this line |class={{{class|}}}
|QUALITY_SCALE=inline
|class={{class mask|{{{class|}}}|redirect=yes}}
|class=
set to any explicit value. --
Redrose64 🌹 (
talk)
22:49, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Can you add
|QUALITY_SCALE = extended
underneath the |IMAGE_LEFT_LARGE = 50px.
The redirect
Template:Wikiproject Denmark has been listed at
redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the
redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 9 § Template:Wikiproject Denmark until a consensus is reached.
Estopedist1 (
talk)
06:29, 9 April 2023 (UTC)