This template is part of WikiProject Algae, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the photosynthetic organisms commonly called
algae and related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page.AlgaeWikipedia:WikiProject AlgaeTemplate:WikiProject AlgaeAlgae articles
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale.
Assessments for WP:PLANTS
EncycloPetey, just a quick question, did you mean for this template to include articles out of WP:PLANTS' scope in the WP:PLANTS project assessment categories? E.g.
diatom just showed up in the
Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Plant articles by quality log because the WP:ALGAE banner was added to it.
WP:CPS and
WP:BANKSIA use the daughter-project banner model because nearly all the articles will also be included in WP:PLANTS. Few exceptions like
Dryandra Moth exist that WP:BANKSIA wants to claim but WP:PLANTS shouldn't, but as far as I know, there's no way to turn off the assessment categories for one parent project when an article exceeds its scope. I'd suggest just getting rid of the WP:PLANTS assessment bits and use both project tags where necessary (green algae?). What do you think? Cheers,
Rkitko(
talk)14:18, 13 January 2010 (UTC)reply
This template is part of WikiProject Algae, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the photosynthetic organisms commonly called
algae and related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page.AlgaeWikipedia:WikiProject AlgaeTemplate:WikiProject AlgaeAlgae articles
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale.
Assessments for WP:PLANTS
EncycloPetey, just a quick question, did you mean for this template to include articles out of WP:PLANTS' scope in the WP:PLANTS project assessment categories? E.g.
diatom just showed up in the
Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Plant articles by quality log because the WP:ALGAE banner was added to it.
WP:CPS and
WP:BANKSIA use the daughter-project banner model because nearly all the articles will also be included in WP:PLANTS. Few exceptions like
Dryandra Moth exist that WP:BANKSIA wants to claim but WP:PLANTS shouldn't, but as far as I know, there's no way to turn off the assessment categories for one parent project when an article exceeds its scope. I'd suggest just getting rid of the WP:PLANTS assessment bits and use both project tags where necessary (green algae?). What do you think? Cheers,
Rkitko(
talk)14:18, 13 January 2010 (UTC)reply