 | Software: Computing Template‑class | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
Usually we don't add minor, point revisions of browsers. There are exceptions, such as Opera 9.5, which was in development for two years, and Safari 3.1, which was the first version that ran on Windows. One might also make the case for Firefox 1.5 or Firefox 3.5. But we can't add most minor versions, or else the table would be so crowded with versions as to be nearly unreadable. -- Schapel ( talk) 19:23, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
- I add all amayas: I recognised that only 0.95; 2.0 and then 9.0 were in the list. the rest was added ;) mabdul 21:13, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
A recent edit uses this topic to promote a new browser, without bothering to take into account notability. A one-line production announcement tacked onto the end of a different topic (browser-addon) doesn't address that issue. TEDickey ( talk) 18:45, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- @ Tedickey What exactly do you mean ? Ecosia is very known. Spectritus ( talk) 15:35, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- The linked topic doesn't support that. Perhaps you have time to find
reliable sources demonstrating its
notability, keeping in mind that this topic is used as a list of notable browsers.
TEDickey (
talk) 18:50, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- If you do some research you'll see that it is notable. It has over 20 million users. Spectritus ( talk) 15:42, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- If you're going to discuss something here, you ought to start by reading the guidelines (which I pointed out above).
TEDickey (
talk) 21:43, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Did you even check Ecosia's wikipedia page ? Spectritus ( talk) 13:01, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
|
| Software: Computing Template‑class | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
Usually we don't add minor, point revisions of browsers. There are exceptions, such as Opera 9.5, which was in development for two years, and Safari 3.1, which was the first version that ran on Windows. One might also make the case for Firefox 1.5 or Firefox 3.5. But we can't add most minor versions, or else the table would be so crowded with versions as to be nearly unreadable. -- Schapel ( talk) 19:23, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
- I add all amayas: I recognised that only 0.95; 2.0 and then 9.0 were in the list. the rest was added ;) mabdul 21:13, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
A recent edit uses this topic to promote a new browser, without bothering to take into account notability. A one-line production announcement tacked onto the end of a different topic (browser-addon) doesn't address that issue. TEDickey ( talk) 18:45, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- @ Tedickey What exactly do you mean ? Ecosia is very known. Spectritus ( talk) 15:35, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- The linked topic doesn't support that. Perhaps you have time to find
reliable sources demonstrating its
notability, keeping in mind that this topic is used as a list of notable browsers.
TEDickey (
talk) 18:50, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- If you do some research you'll see that it is notable. It has over 20 million users. Spectritus ( talk) 15:42, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- If you're going to discuss something here, you ought to start by reading the guidelines (which I pointed out above).
TEDickey (
talk) 21:43, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Did you even check Ecosia's wikipedia page ? Spectritus ( talk) 13:01, 15 June 2024 (UTC)