This template is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football articles
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale.
[Quarterback U]: No reference of any sources claim that Washington Huskies were ever considered as a "Quarterback U", their name is not even on the "Quarterback U" wikipedia page. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
128.208.116.70 (
talk)
23:43, 16 October 2010 (UTC)reply
ping re link removal
@
Jweiss11: Could you clarify/expand your view on
this edit? The edit summary can be read a few different ways, and later morphed into rationalization for edit warring to remove long-standing content. Thanks,
UW Dawgs (
talk)
01:45, 28 June 2017 (UTC)reply
UW Dawgs, simply put, navboxes are for linking to articles, not sections of articles, especially ones that are otherwise linked in the same navbox. If that 1992 game against Nebraska is so notable just for the noise level, then it deserves it own article.
Jweiss11 (
talk)
01:50, 28 June 2017 (UTC)reply
So is it your (informed) opinion that an article is always required for each link in a navbox, rather than arising from policy or project consensus? Is this scoped to just CFB navboxes, or narrowly to our consensus "Culture & lore" section therein, where V/RS elements of a team's tradition will not (and probably should not) always have stand-alone articles by the nature of that content.
UW Dawgs (
talk)
02:11, 28 June 2017 (UTC)reply
I would consider this a Wikipedia-wide best practice for navboxes. Navboxes are intended to provide navigation between articles related to a subject. They are not trophy cases or scrapbooks.
Jweiss11 (
talk)
03:56, 28 June 2017 (UTC)reply
This template is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football articles
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale.
[Quarterback U]: No reference of any sources claim that Washington Huskies were ever considered as a "Quarterback U", their name is not even on the "Quarterback U" wikipedia page. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
128.208.116.70 (
talk)
23:43, 16 October 2010 (UTC)reply
ping re link removal
@
Jweiss11: Could you clarify/expand your view on
this edit? The edit summary can be read a few different ways, and later morphed into rationalization for edit warring to remove long-standing content. Thanks,
UW Dawgs (
talk)
01:45, 28 June 2017 (UTC)reply
UW Dawgs, simply put, navboxes are for linking to articles, not sections of articles, especially ones that are otherwise linked in the same navbox. If that 1992 game against Nebraska is so notable just for the noise level, then it deserves it own article.
Jweiss11 (
talk)
01:50, 28 June 2017 (UTC)reply
So is it your (informed) opinion that an article is always required for each link in a navbox, rather than arising from policy or project consensus? Is this scoped to just CFB navboxes, or narrowly to our consensus "Culture & lore" section therein, where V/RS elements of a team's tradition will not (and probably should not) always have stand-alone articles by the nature of that content.
UW Dawgs (
talk)
02:11, 28 June 2017 (UTC)reply
I would consider this a Wikipedia-wide best practice for navboxes. Navboxes are intended to provide navigation between articles related to a subject. They are not trophy cases or scrapbooks.
Jweiss11 (
talk)
03:56, 28 June 2017 (UTC)reply