![]() | National Register of Historic Places Template‑class | ||||||
|
{{
editprotected}}
Want to add a featured list parameter. Category is already created. The text (preferably after the FA parameter) should be:
Thanks. - Ebyabe ( talk) 17:29, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
{{
editprotected}}
To support the newly created project portal, could the following changes be made, please:
Essentially, stick the portal bits between the pre-existing parts as shown above. Portal category already created. Any questions, please to ask. Thanks! -- Ebyabe ( talk) 22:49, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
{{
editprotected}}
Could the prior portal edits be undone for the time being, please? They can always be un-undone later. Thanks! :) -- Ebyabe ( talk) 00:03, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
{{
portal}}
link - the presence of the portal parameter shouldn't be a problem, but rather allow you to keep track of the pages involved in building your portal. You certainly don't want to have to recategorise them once it's "finished". Re-add the tag when you think you're ready for the portal link to be restored.
Happy‑
melon
12:39, 26 April 2008 (UTC){{ editprotected}}
Please add the following parameter between the "start" and "B" ones. The matching category has already been created:
Cheers! :) -- Ebyabe ( talk) 23:22, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
Can the template be modified to identify infoboxes that are missing? This is a simple but time consuming task that can be easily be identified and placed in a category for any editor interested in cleanup to undertake. I'd suggest using 'template' as the keyword. If no is passed then add it to the category and maybe make a note in the infobox. If yes or blank then ignore. We could do the same for articles without images. However in that case, the request should be added to the appropriate state missing images category if possible. If not then one for the project. I'd suggest using 'image' as the keyword. Vegaswikian ( talk) 19:46, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
{{
editprotected}}
Per discussion at
wt:NRHP, lastly specifically here:
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places#message for WikiProject NRHP Talk page template, could the modified template at:
Template:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places/Feb2009 be copied in, please? Only the "February 2009 update" section is different. The wording was drafted, revised by me, and further revised (also with formatting improvements) by Dudemanfellabra. The wording of the message is now "February 2009 update: the NRHP infobox code has been updated and now allows editors more control over map display and other features. See Template:Infobox nrhp/doc for new syntax." I think it is fine now, ready for prime time. I'd hope for this to be displayed for 2 months or so, then the template can revert to version without this special notice. TIA,
doncram (
talk)
01:04, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
{{editprotected}}
Replace IMAGE_LEFT image "File:Mountrushmore.jpg" with "File:Dean_Franklin_-_06.04.03_Mount_Rushmore_Monument_(by-sa).jpg". Clearer and better image. --
Wikipedical (
talk)
23:20, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
(discussion held at template talk:infobox nrhp moved to here) {{ editprotected}}
The current infobox states: "This article is within the scope of the National Register of Historic Places WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of listings on the U.S. National Register of Historic Places." and then a class rating statement such as "This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale."
How about linking to the Talk page of the Wikiproject, as many other Wikiproject's templates do (such as WikiProject Pennsylvania, for one). Suggested new wording, adapting from Pennsylvania's:
"This article is within the scope of National Register of Historic Places WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks."
-- doncram ( talk) 14:32, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
A new To Do / Task list for the Wikiproject has been established and posted at the Talk page for a couple days. A couple editors made changes. The use of the To Do / Task list seems stable. By this edit i want to now make "Edit protected" request to change the display language to (same as stated above):
change from old/current version: |MAIN_TEXT = This article is within the scope of the National Register of Historic Places WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of listings on the U.S. National Register of Historic Places.
change TO this new version: |MAIN_TEXT = This article is within the scope of National Register of Historic Places WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
-- doncram ( talk) 05:44, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
(end discussion that was moved from template talk:infobox nrhp )
The code shows indication of "infobox=" and "attention=" fields which seem to be about allowing editors to mark that an infobox and/or attention is needed for the article. How are those to be used in practice? The documentation does not show these being used in the "full version" of applying the template. The "infobox needed" aspect does show up in the drop-down towards the top of the documentation, however, but without indication how to use it. At Talk:Stallings-Carpenter House, I tried adding "infobox=yes", "infobox=no", "infobox=1" already, and get no apparent result. How can i use that? Thanks for your consideration. -- doncram ( talk) 18:31, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
In a CFD about Category:NRHP architects, Category:NRHP builders, and Category:NRHP engineers, which are currently hidden, administrative categories, it was suggested that the Template:WikiProject NRHP should be changed to accomodate tracking about them instead. Could parameters architect, builder, engineer be added here? -- do ncr am 09:16, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
Two quotes from the CFD:
{{
WikiProject NRHP|class=|importance=|architect=yes}}
would populate
Category:NRHP architects, and likewise for the other two parameters and categories. --
Black Falcon (
talk)
00:39, 21 July 2012 (UTC)There are a number of persons who served as both architect and builder, particularly of frontier/early days, and some engineers who were also architects. So I think having architect=yes, builder=yes, and engineer=yes, allowing multiple designations for one person/article, is helpful. -- do ncr am 09:16, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
UPDATE IN 2019: the mainspace categories survived the 2012 AFD but were deleted after a new CFD in 2018. The lists of members of the categories were then copied into a project page. What's needed now is for the categories to be created now as Talk page categories within this banner template, to be triggered by "architect=yes", "builder=yes", and/or "engineer=yes". There are definitely some articles where a person acted as both architect and builder, for example, so binary choices for each one are needed. I and maybe a few other editors have assumed that these refinements to the banner template would be made, and have put "architect=yes", etc., into many articles. The only editor who took a narrow view to what belongs in WikiProject NRHP, and who objected to this being done previously is no longer active in Wikipedia. Since then I think there have been numerous affirmations of the usefulness of having articles about all architects who have numerous NRHP-listed works. I personally have been "thanked" dozens or hundreds of times for NRHP architect articles that I created and/or for my related editing in NRHP place articles. I think there is in general approval/consensus that these are part of the WikiProject, and good, and there is no reason at all not to have these binary tags added to the banner template. Could this be done now, please? I will wait for comments, and then hope to proceed by putting in an edit request to implement this, relatively soon. -- Doncram ( talk) 05:34, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
I'm in the early stages of developing a Lua-based replacement for {{ WPBannerMeta}}, and I would appreciate peoples ideas for features. If there is anything that you have wanted to do with your WikiProject template, but haven't been able to due to limitations in the meta-template, I would be very interested to hear it. The discussion is over at Template talk:WPBannerMeta. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 13:43, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
![]() | National Register of Historic Places Template‑class | ||||||
|
{{
editprotected}}
Want to add a featured list parameter. Category is already created. The text (preferably after the FA parameter) should be:
Thanks. - Ebyabe ( talk) 17:29, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
{{
editprotected}}
To support the newly created project portal, could the following changes be made, please:
Essentially, stick the portal bits between the pre-existing parts as shown above. Portal category already created. Any questions, please to ask. Thanks! -- Ebyabe ( talk) 22:49, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
{{
editprotected}}
Could the prior portal edits be undone for the time being, please? They can always be un-undone later. Thanks! :) -- Ebyabe ( talk) 00:03, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
{{
portal}}
link - the presence of the portal parameter shouldn't be a problem, but rather allow you to keep track of the pages involved in building your portal. You certainly don't want to have to recategorise them once it's "finished". Re-add the tag when you think you're ready for the portal link to be restored.
Happy‑
melon
12:39, 26 April 2008 (UTC){{ editprotected}}
Please add the following parameter between the "start" and "B" ones. The matching category has already been created:
Cheers! :) -- Ebyabe ( talk) 23:22, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
Can the template be modified to identify infoboxes that are missing? This is a simple but time consuming task that can be easily be identified and placed in a category for any editor interested in cleanup to undertake. I'd suggest using 'template' as the keyword. If no is passed then add it to the category and maybe make a note in the infobox. If yes or blank then ignore. We could do the same for articles without images. However in that case, the request should be added to the appropriate state missing images category if possible. If not then one for the project. I'd suggest using 'image' as the keyword. Vegaswikian ( talk) 19:46, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
{{
editprotected}}
Per discussion at
wt:NRHP, lastly specifically here:
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places#message for WikiProject NRHP Talk page template, could the modified template at:
Template:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places/Feb2009 be copied in, please? Only the "February 2009 update" section is different. The wording was drafted, revised by me, and further revised (also with formatting improvements) by Dudemanfellabra. The wording of the message is now "February 2009 update: the NRHP infobox code has been updated and now allows editors more control over map display and other features. See Template:Infobox nrhp/doc for new syntax." I think it is fine now, ready for prime time. I'd hope for this to be displayed for 2 months or so, then the template can revert to version without this special notice. TIA,
doncram (
talk)
01:04, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
{{editprotected}}
Replace IMAGE_LEFT image "File:Mountrushmore.jpg" with "File:Dean_Franklin_-_06.04.03_Mount_Rushmore_Monument_(by-sa).jpg". Clearer and better image. --
Wikipedical (
talk)
23:20, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
(discussion held at template talk:infobox nrhp moved to here) {{ editprotected}}
The current infobox states: "This article is within the scope of the National Register of Historic Places WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of listings on the U.S. National Register of Historic Places." and then a class rating statement such as "This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale."
How about linking to the Talk page of the Wikiproject, as many other Wikiproject's templates do (such as WikiProject Pennsylvania, for one). Suggested new wording, adapting from Pennsylvania's:
"This article is within the scope of National Register of Historic Places WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks."
-- doncram ( talk) 14:32, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
A new To Do / Task list for the Wikiproject has been established and posted at the Talk page for a couple days. A couple editors made changes. The use of the To Do / Task list seems stable. By this edit i want to now make "Edit protected" request to change the display language to (same as stated above):
change from old/current version: |MAIN_TEXT = This article is within the scope of the National Register of Historic Places WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of listings on the U.S. National Register of Historic Places.
change TO this new version: |MAIN_TEXT = This article is within the scope of National Register of Historic Places WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
-- doncram ( talk) 05:44, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
(end discussion that was moved from template talk:infobox nrhp )
The code shows indication of "infobox=" and "attention=" fields which seem to be about allowing editors to mark that an infobox and/or attention is needed for the article. How are those to be used in practice? The documentation does not show these being used in the "full version" of applying the template. The "infobox needed" aspect does show up in the drop-down towards the top of the documentation, however, but without indication how to use it. At Talk:Stallings-Carpenter House, I tried adding "infobox=yes", "infobox=no", "infobox=1" already, and get no apparent result. How can i use that? Thanks for your consideration. -- doncram ( talk) 18:31, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
In a CFD about Category:NRHP architects, Category:NRHP builders, and Category:NRHP engineers, which are currently hidden, administrative categories, it was suggested that the Template:WikiProject NRHP should be changed to accomodate tracking about them instead. Could parameters architect, builder, engineer be added here? -- do ncr am 09:16, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
Two quotes from the CFD:
{{
WikiProject NRHP|class=|importance=|architect=yes}}
would populate
Category:NRHP architects, and likewise for the other two parameters and categories. --
Black Falcon (
talk)
00:39, 21 July 2012 (UTC)There are a number of persons who served as both architect and builder, particularly of frontier/early days, and some engineers who were also architects. So I think having architect=yes, builder=yes, and engineer=yes, allowing multiple designations for one person/article, is helpful. -- do ncr am 09:16, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
UPDATE IN 2019: the mainspace categories survived the 2012 AFD but were deleted after a new CFD in 2018. The lists of members of the categories were then copied into a project page. What's needed now is for the categories to be created now as Talk page categories within this banner template, to be triggered by "architect=yes", "builder=yes", and/or "engineer=yes". There are definitely some articles where a person acted as both architect and builder, for example, so binary choices for each one are needed. I and maybe a few other editors have assumed that these refinements to the banner template would be made, and have put "architect=yes", etc., into many articles. The only editor who took a narrow view to what belongs in WikiProject NRHP, and who objected to this being done previously is no longer active in Wikipedia. Since then I think there have been numerous affirmations of the usefulness of having articles about all architects who have numerous NRHP-listed works. I personally have been "thanked" dozens or hundreds of times for NRHP architect articles that I created and/or for my related editing in NRHP place articles. I think there is in general approval/consensus that these are part of the WikiProject, and good, and there is no reason at all not to have these binary tags added to the banner template. Could this be done now, please? I will wait for comments, and then hope to proceed by putting in an edit request to implement this, relatively soon. -- Doncram ( talk) 05:34, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
I'm in the early stages of developing a Lua-based replacement for {{ WPBannerMeta}}, and I would appreciate peoples ideas for features. If there is anything that you have wanted to do with your WikiProject template, but haven't been able to due to limitations in the meta-template, I would be very interested to hear it. The discussion is over at Template talk:WPBannerMeta. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 13:43, 18 June 2013 (UTC)