Christianity: Anglicanism Template‑class | ||||||||||
|
As examples, both on this page and over on Template_talk:Archbishops_of_Canterbury, the colon is not appearing between the Template and Pagename as the first words of the infobox. I was not going to mess with the template as it is very intricate, but I thought I would mention it. — MrDolomite • Talk 01:01, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
The edit link has the following literal URL http://en.wikipedia.org{{localurl/Comments|action=edit%7D%7D
. Therefore it does not link to the correct page to edit the comments. Someone knowledgeable in the template please edit to fix. --
Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (
Talk) 12:42, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
What is the 'orphan' parameter for? If it is 'yes', the text: "... is not assigned to a WikiProject or workgroup" spits out, which is wrong, as adding the banner assigns the article to WikiProject Anglicanism.
It seems that no articles use it, since Category:Anglicanism articles without a WikiProject is empty. I suggest that 'orphan' be disabled.
-- Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) ( Talk) 13:46, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
-- Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) ( Talk) 20:05, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, we don't use it. -- Secisek ( talk) 19:11, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
Both {{Template:WikiProject Anglicanism}} and {{WikiProject Christianity|anglicanism=yes}} can be added to talk pages, and the Christianity one also adds the Christanity project. Is this template redundant, or are there circumstances where an article is in the Anglican project but not in the Christianity one? Peter E. James ( talk) 01:09, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
I have just posted the following on the Anglicanism Portal Talk-Page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Anglicanism#Does_the_Anglicanism_Template_need_more_work_on_it.3F and would appreciate any comments being posted there rather than here. Thanks
I much appreciate the time and effort put into the scripting of the Anglicanism template and I know that there has been an earlier discussion of the point I am now going to raise. But as a newcomer, I feel that the end result as displayed is too heavy for the page. If it appears opposite a short lead with a long TOC under it, the end result is a visual horror (see Book of Common Prayer). Would it be possible for the detailed menus under each main section to become "drop-down" ones when the cursor is moved over the main section name? Alternatively, could a small "logo" be devised with a link to the overall menu? Perhaps this should be on the talk:template-page but I suspect few people look there and I will post a link there
--Jpacobb (talk) 21:19, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Can you replace the
File:COTWnew.png
to
File:Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive.svg
. Higher resolution image. ___
CAPTAIN MEDUSA
talk (We are the champions, my friends) 13:22, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
{{
edit template-protected}}
template.
qedk (
t 桜
c) 07:18, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Christianity: Anglicanism Template‑class | ||||||||||
|
As examples, both on this page and over on Template_talk:Archbishops_of_Canterbury, the colon is not appearing between the Template and Pagename as the first words of the infobox. I was not going to mess with the template as it is very intricate, but I thought I would mention it. — MrDolomite • Talk 01:01, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
The edit link has the following literal URL http://en.wikipedia.org{{localurl/Comments|action=edit%7D%7D
. Therefore it does not link to the correct page to edit the comments. Someone knowledgeable in the template please edit to fix. --
Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (
Talk) 12:42, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
What is the 'orphan' parameter for? If it is 'yes', the text: "... is not assigned to a WikiProject or workgroup" spits out, which is wrong, as adding the banner assigns the article to WikiProject Anglicanism.
It seems that no articles use it, since Category:Anglicanism articles without a WikiProject is empty. I suggest that 'orphan' be disabled.
-- Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) ( Talk) 13:46, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
-- Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) ( Talk) 20:05, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, we don't use it. -- Secisek ( talk) 19:11, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
Both {{Template:WikiProject Anglicanism}} and {{WikiProject Christianity|anglicanism=yes}} can be added to talk pages, and the Christianity one also adds the Christanity project. Is this template redundant, or are there circumstances where an article is in the Anglican project but not in the Christianity one? Peter E. James ( talk) 01:09, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
I have just posted the following on the Anglicanism Portal Talk-Page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Anglicanism#Does_the_Anglicanism_Template_need_more_work_on_it.3F and would appreciate any comments being posted there rather than here. Thanks
I much appreciate the time and effort put into the scripting of the Anglicanism template and I know that there has been an earlier discussion of the point I am now going to raise. But as a newcomer, I feel that the end result as displayed is too heavy for the page. If it appears opposite a short lead with a long TOC under it, the end result is a visual horror (see Book of Common Prayer). Would it be possible for the detailed menus under each main section to become "drop-down" ones when the cursor is moved over the main section name? Alternatively, could a small "logo" be devised with a link to the overall menu? Perhaps this should be on the talk:template-page but I suspect few people look there and I will post a link there
--Jpacobb (talk) 21:19, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Can you replace the
File:COTWnew.png
to
File:Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive.svg
. Higher resolution image. ___
CAPTAIN MEDUSA
talk (We are the champions, my friends) 13:22, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
{{
edit template-protected}}
template.
qedk (
t 桜
c) 07:18, 21 September 2019 (UTC)