Hinduism Template‑class | |||||||
|
India Template‑class | |||||||
|
The line keeps it all in line and always in line.. Wikidās 21:26, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
Madhava 1947, Hello. You have omited some critical information on the template. The essential seems to be lacking and that is english translation, its is not only for hindus, I mean the Wikipedia. We will have to revert some changes to retain NPOV of the template. Wikidās ॐ writes this on 13:22, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Article Vallabhacharya does not explain what is "Rudra-sampradaya". So linking Rudra-sampradaya to Vallabhacharya leads to confusion.-- Redtigerxyz ( talk) 13:54, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Why do we have both Template:VaishnavaSampradayasrs and Template:VaisnavaSampradayas when only one is needed? -- Shruti14 t c s 23:13, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
The correct English spelling is Vaishnava. I propose a move from Template:VaisnavaSampradayas to Template:VaishnavaSampradayas to reflect the English spelling. -- Shruti14 t c s 23:13, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
I think if you move, you can create a redirect so that all pages will work. I accept that its a common spelling, but this spelling is not a common rule to templates, unless you know something I do not. Its a transliteration of the (Vaiṣṇava-sampradāya) Wikidās ॐ 23:18, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
I have nominated Template:VaishnavaSampradayasrs for deletion as suggested, as this template is the better one and more widely used. Please comment and support/oppose the nomination there. Thanks -- Shruti14 t c s 01:22, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
Hinduism Template‑class | |||||||
|
India Template‑class | |||||||
|
The line keeps it all in line and always in line.. Wikidās 21:26, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
Madhava 1947, Hello. You have omited some critical information on the template. The essential seems to be lacking and that is english translation, its is not only for hindus, I mean the Wikipedia. We will have to revert some changes to retain NPOV of the template. Wikidās ॐ writes this on 13:22, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Article Vallabhacharya does not explain what is "Rudra-sampradaya". So linking Rudra-sampradaya to Vallabhacharya leads to confusion.-- Redtigerxyz ( talk) 13:54, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Why do we have both Template:VaishnavaSampradayasrs and Template:VaisnavaSampradayas when only one is needed? -- Shruti14 t c s 23:13, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
The correct English spelling is Vaishnava. I propose a move from Template:VaisnavaSampradayas to Template:VaishnavaSampradayas to reflect the English spelling. -- Shruti14 t c s 23:13, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
I think if you move, you can create a redirect so that all pages will work. I accept that its a common spelling, but this spelling is not a common rule to templates, unless you know something I do not. Its a transliteration of the (Vaiṣṇava-sampradāya) Wikidās ॐ 23:18, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
I have nominated Template:VaishnavaSampradayasrs for deletion as suggested, as this template is the better one and more widely used. Please comment and support/oppose the nomination there. Thanks -- Shruti14 t c s 01:22, 24 May 2008 (UTC)