![]() | United States Template‑class | ||||||
|
![]() | Military history: Aviation / National / North America / United States Template‑class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It seems not all of us agree about the inclusion of the CAP. my argument is that being an auxilliary of the USAF, and thier strong association with the uniformed service, it merits inclusion somewhere. While it may not be a command of the Air Force, we could include is somewhere else. I had placed it under that section administratively because, well, I didn't know where else it fits. bahamut0013 ♠ ♣ 12:02, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
The link to the comic strip wiki page is not appropriate. It is a comercial enterprise seeking private donations. 173.5.175.130 ( talk) 05:10, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
I concur with BilCat on this, there is no way that this web cartoon is important enough to the history of the USAF to appear in the Navbox, any more than the (far more influential) Bill Mauldin should be at {{US Army navbox}}. The problem isn't so much that it is unofficial, as that it simply isn't important enough. Please find a more appropriate place to link this from - if Culture of the United States Air Force doesn't exist, why don't you create it?-- Jackyd101 ( talk) 22:55, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
Dont think the Air Force Blues is that important to add to this navbox and certainly does not appear to be related to History and traditions. Just a fictional website/story not any more notable then loads of other fictional stories about the air force. MilborneOne ( talk) 20:27, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Ditto what was already said, Air Force Blues isn't important enough to be put with all the other articles in this template. -- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 01:58, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
It seems that consensus is against me. I shall relent then. bahamut0013 words deeds 23:56, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
We should remove the flags as per WP:ICONDECORATION, at 20px they are tiny blurs of flags that most people have never seen before Gnevin ( talk) 14:46, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
There are many more training courses that Airmen attend that could be added to the training section of this navbox (ALS, NCOA, SNCOA, ASBC, SOS, ACSC, AWC, Chief School, General School, etc). What's the best way to add them? We could list them all, add a link to the Professional military education in the United States Air Force article, or have the navbox link to a list of Air Force Training. What are some other ideas/opinions? Fightin' Phillie 16:15, 20 May 2011 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fightin' Phillie ( talk • contribs)
CAP should be moved into the command section as it is now considered to be part of the total force ( http://www.airforcemag.com/DRArchive/Pages/2016/June%202016/June%2029%202016/ACC-Assumes-Authority-for-CAP.aspx) by the USAF. Does anyone disagree with this proposed move? Garuda28 ( talk) 00:42, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Propose rename to Template:United States Air Force. This would allign it with the full name of the service, along with the same title as the main page. Garuda28 ( talk) 21:19, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: template moved as requested, per the discussion below. Dekimasu よ! 00:55, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
Template:US Air Force navbox → Template:United States Air Force (corrected) – To unify the name with the main page United States Air Force, as well as unifying the name with the organization. I received no response when prompting the discussion a few days ago on the template's talk page, and I believe such a move would be uncontroversial. Garuda28 ( talk) 20:03, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
![]() | United States Template‑class | ||||||
|
![]() | Military history: Aviation / National / North America / United States Template‑class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It seems not all of us agree about the inclusion of the CAP. my argument is that being an auxilliary of the USAF, and thier strong association with the uniformed service, it merits inclusion somewhere. While it may not be a command of the Air Force, we could include is somewhere else. I had placed it under that section administratively because, well, I didn't know where else it fits. bahamut0013 ♠ ♣ 12:02, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
The link to the comic strip wiki page is not appropriate. It is a comercial enterprise seeking private donations. 173.5.175.130 ( talk) 05:10, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
I concur with BilCat on this, there is no way that this web cartoon is important enough to the history of the USAF to appear in the Navbox, any more than the (far more influential) Bill Mauldin should be at {{US Army navbox}}. The problem isn't so much that it is unofficial, as that it simply isn't important enough. Please find a more appropriate place to link this from - if Culture of the United States Air Force doesn't exist, why don't you create it?-- Jackyd101 ( talk) 22:55, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
Dont think the Air Force Blues is that important to add to this navbox and certainly does not appear to be related to History and traditions. Just a fictional website/story not any more notable then loads of other fictional stories about the air force. MilborneOne ( talk) 20:27, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Ditto what was already said, Air Force Blues isn't important enough to be put with all the other articles in this template. -- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 01:58, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
It seems that consensus is against me. I shall relent then. bahamut0013 words deeds 23:56, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
We should remove the flags as per WP:ICONDECORATION, at 20px they are tiny blurs of flags that most people have never seen before Gnevin ( talk) 14:46, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
There are many more training courses that Airmen attend that could be added to the training section of this navbox (ALS, NCOA, SNCOA, ASBC, SOS, ACSC, AWC, Chief School, General School, etc). What's the best way to add them? We could list them all, add a link to the Professional military education in the United States Air Force article, or have the navbox link to a list of Air Force Training. What are some other ideas/opinions? Fightin' Phillie 16:15, 20 May 2011 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fightin' Phillie ( talk • contribs)
CAP should be moved into the command section as it is now considered to be part of the total force ( http://www.airforcemag.com/DRArchive/Pages/2016/June%202016/June%2029%202016/ACC-Assumes-Authority-for-CAP.aspx) by the USAF. Does anyone disagree with this proposed move? Garuda28 ( talk) 00:42, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Propose rename to Template:United States Air Force. This would allign it with the full name of the service, along with the same title as the main page. Garuda28 ( talk) 21:19, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: template moved as requested, per the discussion below. Dekimasu よ! 00:55, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
Template:US Air Force navbox → Template:United States Air Force (corrected) – To unify the name with the main page United States Air Force, as well as unifying the name with the organization. I received no response when prompting the discussion a few days ago on the template's talk page, and I believe such a move would be uncontroversial. Garuda28 ( talk) 20:03, 9 February 2018 (UTC)