![]() | Trains: in UK / in London Template‑class | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Unlike most of your edits, I find
this change rather pointless as there are only two stations (
Hammersmith and
Edgware Road) that have parenthetical disambiguation in their titles, and neither one follows the format you added. (They both follow the form Xxx tube station (Yyy line)
.) Besides which, there’s already {{
LUL stations}} which provides an expanded range of options for when they are needed.
Useddenim (
talk)
23:42, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
I would like to suggest an updated to this template, as follows:
[[{{#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{1}}} tube station({{{2}}})|{{{1}}} tube station}}|{{{1}}}|alt={{{1}}}]]<noinclude>
{{documentation}}</noinclude>
This will allow the line to be specified like Hammersmith and Edgware Road.
-- Dkbottomley ( talk) 15:48, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the update it was only a suggestion to possible make RDT templates cleaner, but seeing there is inconsistencies in naming (which seems to be a common issue here) it would not always help anyway.-- Dkbottomley ( talk) 23:28, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
![]() | Trains: in UK / in London Template‑class | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Unlike most of your edits, I find
this change rather pointless as there are only two stations (
Hammersmith and
Edgware Road) that have parenthetical disambiguation in their titles, and neither one follows the format you added. (They both follow the form Xxx tube station (Yyy line)
.) Besides which, there’s already {{
LUL stations}} which provides an expanded range of options for when they are needed.
Useddenim (
talk)
23:42, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
I would like to suggest an updated to this template, as follows:
[[{{#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{1}}} tube station({{{2}}})|{{{1}}} tube station}}|{{{1}}}|alt={{{1}}}]]<noinclude>
{{documentation}}</noinclude>
This will allow the line to be specified like Hammersmith and Edgware Road.
-- Dkbottomley ( talk) 15:48, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the update it was only a suggestion to possible make RDT templates cleaner, but seeing there is inconsistencies in naming (which seems to be a common issue here) it would not always help anyway.-- Dkbottomley ( talk) 23:28, 2 April 2014 (UTC)