This template was considered for deletion on 2017 October 12. The result of the discussion was "no consensus". |
Rock music Template‑class | |||||||
|
This template survived a discussion on TfD. See Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 February 13. - Splash talk 01:10, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
@ 28bytes, Koavf, FlightTime, and Jax 0677: Can you guys discuss this before continuing this senseless edit warring? All four of you should really know better than to just revert and say discuss it without you discussing it further. That being said, old band members are normally placed on the second row, despite their status in their band prior. See {{ Queen}}, {{ The Beatles}}, and {{ The Rolling Stones}} as just a few examples. Now, can this be discussed before continuing? Nihlus 14:02, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
This is not difficult. Look at (e.g.--choosing randomly, altho they are template that I'm sure I've edited before) Template:Grateful Dead or Template:Led Zeppelin, the members of this defunct band are all listed in alphabetical order. Having some random order is not helpful, so I don't understand why others are insistent on imposing some unique sorting scheme. ― Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 17:16, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
This is on its way to getting listed among the WP:LAMEest editing wars ever. (Right up there with T/the Beatles). Tom Petty formed this band, they have never recorded independently of Petty (though he has recorded independently of them) and it would be WP:CRYSTAL at this point to treat this band as if it they might continue to put out albums just as "The Heartbreakers," which they have not done so far. If they do so at some point, at that point they would basically be a different band altogether. Another comparison is Template:Bruce_Springsteen, where the E Street Band has a separate article, in part because they HAVE recorded with other musicians independent of Springsteen. (see E_Street_Band#Southside_Johnny.2C_Ronnie_Spector_and_Gary_U.S._Bonds) Montanabw (talk) 17:30, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
This template was considered for deletion on 2017 October 12. The result of the discussion was "no consensus". |
Rock music Template‑class | |||||||
|
This template survived a discussion on TfD. See Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 February 13. - Splash talk 01:10, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
@ 28bytes, Koavf, FlightTime, and Jax 0677: Can you guys discuss this before continuing this senseless edit warring? All four of you should really know better than to just revert and say discuss it without you discussing it further. That being said, old band members are normally placed on the second row, despite their status in their band prior. See {{ Queen}}, {{ The Beatles}}, and {{ The Rolling Stones}} as just a few examples. Now, can this be discussed before continuing? Nihlus 14:02, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
This is not difficult. Look at (e.g.--choosing randomly, altho they are template that I'm sure I've edited before) Template:Grateful Dead or Template:Led Zeppelin, the members of this defunct band are all listed in alphabetical order. Having some random order is not helpful, so I don't understand why others are insistent on imposing some unique sorting scheme. ― Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 17:16, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
This is on its way to getting listed among the WP:LAMEest editing wars ever. (Right up there with T/the Beatles). Tom Petty formed this band, they have never recorded independently of Petty (though he has recorded independently of them) and it would be WP:CRYSTAL at this point to treat this band as if it they might continue to put out albums just as "The Heartbreakers," which they have not done so far. If they do so at some point, at that point they would basically be a different band altogether. Another comparison is Template:Bruce_Springsteen, where the E Street Band has a separate article, in part because they HAVE recorded with other musicians independent of Springsteen. (see E_Street_Band#Southside_Johnny.2C_Ronnie_Spector_and_Gary_U.S._Bonds) Montanabw (talk) 17:30, 26 October 2017 (UTC)