![]() | Switzerland Template‑class | ||||||
|
de:Rechtsextremismus in der Schweiz
this should be a full article (like, written in prose), not a suggestive template for transclusion. Move it to Swiss far right or or Far right (Switzerland). In terms of neutrality, it is not acceptable to list Henri Guisan in a list of racists, fascists and holocaust deniers. Guisan was a member of the SVV, but he is not notable because he ever publicly defended pro-Nazi positions, he is notable as a general (he was a nationalist, to be sure, but rather contrary to the creepy pro-Nazis of the time, he made it clear he was going to resist Nazi invasion to the last). Similarly, it is undue to list a generally populist party like the SVP among neonazi, racist and fascist organisations. A prose discussion can point out that the SVP has a number of active neo-fascists among its members, but that's not the same as implying that it is a neo-fascist party by nature of its official program. -- dab (𒁳) 09:56, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
fine -- I will create a stub now and we'll see how it goes. The SVP will certainly be mentioned in such an article. However, nobody argues they are part of the "extreme right". They are (since the late 1980s) a textbook case of right-wing populism, and there are certainly overlaps with the far right, but as a party covering 29% of the popular vote, these overlaps happen to be at the party's right fringe. The far right in Switzerland historically has support ranging between 5% and 15%. The dividing line between "far right", merely "conservatist" and "neoliberal" runs straight across the SVP. It should also be pointed out that the compsition of cantonal parties shows vast divergence. The Zurich chapter is clearly neoliberal, while the Vaud chapter is moderately traditionalist-conservative. It is hard to believe they form branches of the same party, and I would predict that if the SVP grows any larger, it will necessarily undergo seccession. dab (𒁳) 15:49, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Why is Jurgen Graf put here cause he is a holocaust denial? -- 190.172.217.98 ( talk) 03:25, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
The Campaign for an Independent and Neutral Switzerland should NOT be linked to this template. It hardly qualifies as a "far-right" organization. I think its quite clear that it is in the mainstream of conservatism (it is well accepted by the SVP and other conservatives). -- 1990'sguy ( talk) 19:19, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
![]() | Switzerland Template‑class | ||||||
|
de:Rechtsextremismus in der Schweiz
this should be a full article (like, written in prose), not a suggestive template for transclusion. Move it to Swiss far right or or Far right (Switzerland). In terms of neutrality, it is not acceptable to list Henri Guisan in a list of racists, fascists and holocaust deniers. Guisan was a member of the SVV, but he is not notable because he ever publicly defended pro-Nazi positions, he is notable as a general (he was a nationalist, to be sure, but rather contrary to the creepy pro-Nazis of the time, he made it clear he was going to resist Nazi invasion to the last). Similarly, it is undue to list a generally populist party like the SVP among neonazi, racist and fascist organisations. A prose discussion can point out that the SVP has a number of active neo-fascists among its members, but that's not the same as implying that it is a neo-fascist party by nature of its official program. -- dab (𒁳) 09:56, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
fine -- I will create a stub now and we'll see how it goes. The SVP will certainly be mentioned in such an article. However, nobody argues they are part of the "extreme right". They are (since the late 1980s) a textbook case of right-wing populism, and there are certainly overlaps with the far right, but as a party covering 29% of the popular vote, these overlaps happen to be at the party's right fringe. The far right in Switzerland historically has support ranging between 5% and 15%. The dividing line between "far right", merely "conservatist" and "neoliberal" runs straight across the SVP. It should also be pointed out that the compsition of cantonal parties shows vast divergence. The Zurich chapter is clearly neoliberal, while the Vaud chapter is moderately traditionalist-conservative. It is hard to believe they form branches of the same party, and I would predict that if the SVP grows any larger, it will necessarily undergo seccession. dab (𒁳) 15:49, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Why is Jurgen Graf put here cause he is a holocaust denial? -- 190.172.217.98 ( talk) 03:25, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
The Campaign for an Independent and Neutral Switzerland should NOT be linked to this template. It hardly qualifies as a "far-right" organization. I think its quite clear that it is in the mainstream of conservatism (it is well accepted by the SVP and other conservatives). -- 1990'sguy ( talk) 19:19, 3 May 2016 (UTC)