I am afraid that the introduction of this box at this time is seriously flawed. The "Justices" listed will not all become justices - in fact, 25% (Lord Hoffmann, Lord Scott and Lord Carswell) will have retired and it is possible that Lord Saville will call it a day at roughly the same time (having not sat for 8 years) to clear the way. Lord Hope will be the Deputy President and should probably be marked as such in the info box. I strongly suggest that this info box is removed, at least until the opening of the Court (supposedly October 2009), at which point the Law Lords box can just be changed over. It is just plainly incorrect at the moment: not one "Justice" listed is currently a Justice of the Supreme Court.
Has anyone read this (above)? 131.111.234.142 ( talk) 16:55, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
I feel it is unnecessary to list all the "of Welwyn Garden City" bits after every judge's name. It adds nothing to them and is simply used to distinguish between peers with the same surname. None of the present judges shares the same surname, therefore it is just an unnecessary piece of heraldry. It makes much more sense in a navigation box to able to look and see quickly each judge's (simple) name. Johnhousefriday ( talk) 14:19, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
I am afraid that the introduction of this box at this time is seriously flawed. The "Justices" listed will not all become justices - in fact, 25% (Lord Hoffmann, Lord Scott and Lord Carswell) will have retired and it is possible that Lord Saville will call it a day at roughly the same time (having not sat for 8 years) to clear the way. Lord Hope will be the Deputy President and should probably be marked as such in the info box. I strongly suggest that this info box is removed, at least until the opening of the Court (supposedly October 2009), at which point the Law Lords box can just be changed over. It is just plainly incorrect at the moment: not one "Justice" listed is currently a Justice of the Supreme Court.
Has anyone read this (above)? 131.111.234.142 ( talk) 16:55, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
I feel it is unnecessary to list all the "of Welwyn Garden City" bits after every judge's name. It adds nothing to them and is simply used to distinguish between peers with the same surname. None of the present judges shares the same surname, therefore it is just an unnecessary piece of heraldry. It makes much more sense in a navigation box to able to look and see quickly each judge's (simple) name. Johnhousefriday ( talk) 14:19, 5 August 2010 (UTC)