![]() | Trains: in UK / in Scotland Template‑class | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Glasgow commuter lines section of this template is extremely poor from the point of view of visibility. The text for "North Clyde Line", for example, is barely legible, and so is that for "Ayrshire Coast Line". Several of the others aren't much better. IMO the colour-coding makes it harder to read, not easier, so defeats the object. Loganberry ( Talk) 01:20, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
Railway lines in Scotland | |
---|---|
Main lines: | East Coast, West Coast, Glasgow—Edinburgh (via Falkirk), Highland, Ayrshire Coast, Glasgow—Edinburgh (via Carstairs), Glasgow South Western |
Glasgow commuter lines: | █ Argyle, █ Ayrshire Coast, █ Cathcart Circle, █ Croy, █ Cumbernauld, █ Inverclyde, █ Maryhill, █ Motherwell—Cumbernauld, █ North Clyde, █ Paisley Canal, █ Shotts, █ South Western, █ Whifflet |
Edinburgh commuter lines: | Crossrail, Bathgate, Dunblane, Fife Circle, North Berwick, Shotts, Waverley |
Rural lines: | Aberdeen—Inverness, Far North, Kyle of Lochalsh, West Highland |
I removed this line as it is already covered as the Tay Coast Line and possibly others. I am just wondering now, what seperates a main line from a rural line? Simply south 21:50, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Is it necessary to have the (rather long) list of historical railway companies on this template? It makes the template a lot bigger. Also, it seems confusing to have railway companies on a template named railway lines. I suggest removing them from this template, and creating a separate template for "Historical Scottish Railway Companies". -- Vclaw 10:54, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
Editors may be interested in the debate currently ongoing at Template talk:Railway lines in South-East England over the layout, classification and geographical scope of these templates. Pickle 16:47, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
old template, minus cats Pickle 18:29, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Should they be split off? Simply south 23:57, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
A noticable ommission from the Express routes. It was established as a "ScotRail Express" route long ago, using firstly the additional batch of push pull stock, and now an hourly service with 170's. It would cover the inappropriate Tay Coast line, which is just two uncovered routes lumped together better than thats current entry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.27.129.31 ( talk) 10:39, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
Should it really be included on this template? It's a rail service, not a rail line. GullibleKit ( talk) 20:09, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
![]() | Trains: in UK / in Scotland Template‑class | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Glasgow commuter lines section of this template is extremely poor from the point of view of visibility. The text for "North Clyde Line", for example, is barely legible, and so is that for "Ayrshire Coast Line". Several of the others aren't much better. IMO the colour-coding makes it harder to read, not easier, so defeats the object. Loganberry ( Talk) 01:20, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
Railway lines in Scotland | |
---|---|
Main lines: | East Coast, West Coast, Glasgow—Edinburgh (via Falkirk), Highland, Ayrshire Coast, Glasgow—Edinburgh (via Carstairs), Glasgow South Western |
Glasgow commuter lines: | █ Argyle, █ Ayrshire Coast, █ Cathcart Circle, █ Croy, █ Cumbernauld, █ Inverclyde, █ Maryhill, █ Motherwell—Cumbernauld, █ North Clyde, █ Paisley Canal, █ Shotts, █ South Western, █ Whifflet |
Edinburgh commuter lines: | Crossrail, Bathgate, Dunblane, Fife Circle, North Berwick, Shotts, Waverley |
Rural lines: | Aberdeen—Inverness, Far North, Kyle of Lochalsh, West Highland |
I removed this line as it is already covered as the Tay Coast Line and possibly others. I am just wondering now, what seperates a main line from a rural line? Simply south 21:50, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Is it necessary to have the (rather long) list of historical railway companies on this template? It makes the template a lot bigger. Also, it seems confusing to have railway companies on a template named railway lines. I suggest removing them from this template, and creating a separate template for "Historical Scottish Railway Companies". -- Vclaw 10:54, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
Editors may be interested in the debate currently ongoing at Template talk:Railway lines in South-East England over the layout, classification and geographical scope of these templates. Pickle 16:47, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
old template, minus cats Pickle 18:29, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Should they be split off? Simply south 23:57, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
A noticable ommission from the Express routes. It was established as a "ScotRail Express" route long ago, using firstly the additional batch of push pull stock, and now an hourly service with 170's. It would cover the inappropriate Tay Coast line, which is just two uncovered routes lumped together better than thats current entry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.27.129.31 ( talk) 10:39, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
Should it really be included on this template? It's a rail service, not a rail line. GullibleKit ( talk) 20:09, 12 August 2008 (UTC)