![]() | This template was considered for merging with Template:Ussc on 2015 June 28. The result of the discussion was "no consensus". |
![]() | This template was considered for deletion on 2016 May 25. The result of the discussion was "merge". |
This template seems to be a fork of Template:ussc. Based on the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases#Including case citations in the article lead, I propose redirecting this template to Template:ussc. Any objections? UnitedStatesian ( talk) 12:21, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
The external-link thing is still, IMO, a significant issue. True, WP:EL says external links "should not normally" appear in an article body — but it also says (see note 2 on the page) that "exceptions are rare" and lists only a few likely exceptions. Unless we either deal with this question first (by making appropriate changes to the templates), or else obtain a consensus at the WP:EL talk page relaxing the "normal" avoidance of external links in an article body, the proposed redirect runs the risk of being doggedly and forcefully reverted by people insisting that the WP:EL violation is unacceptable. — Rich wales (no relation to Jimbo) 20:35, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This template was considered for merging with Template:Ussc on 2015 June 28. The result of the discussion was "no consensus". |
![]() | This template was considered for deletion on 2016 May 25. The result of the discussion was "merge". |
This template seems to be a fork of Template:ussc. Based on the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases#Including case citations in the article lead, I propose redirecting this template to Template:ussc. Any objections? UnitedStatesian ( talk) 12:21, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
The external-link thing is still, IMO, a significant issue. True, WP:EL says external links "should not normally" appear in an article body — but it also says (see note 2 on the page) that "exceptions are rare" and lists only a few likely exceptions. Unless we either deal with this question first (by making appropriate changes to the templates), or else obtain a consensus at the WP:EL talk page relaxing the "normal" avoidance of external links in an article body, the proposed redirect runs the risk of being doggedly and forcefully reverted by people insisting that the WP:EL violation is unacceptable. — Rich wales (no relation to Jimbo) 20:35, 28 June 2015 (UTC)