![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
Do we need such a big picture? It should be small enough that it doesn't enlarge the template. Richard001 ( talk) 23:49, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
why remove criticism from "see also"? Leave the link to the article on the Dawkins delusion. Hypershock ( talk) 14:35, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
Should this be included under 'documentaries' or at all? Dawkins is only one of the six interviewees, and he has surely played a similarly large role in many other documentaries (e.g. Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed to name a particularly bad one). That all the other documentaries are his own work makes it a bit misleading too. Richard001 ( talk) 07:16, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
Should these be included? Richard001 ( talk) 00:19, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
Do we need such a big picture? It should be small enough that it doesn't enlarge the template. Richard001 ( talk) 23:49, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
why remove criticism from "see also"? Leave the link to the article on the Dawkins delusion. Hypershock ( talk) 14:35, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
Should this be included under 'documentaries' or at all? Dawkins is only one of the six interviewees, and he has surely played a similarly large role in many other documentaries (e.g. Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed to name a particularly bad one). That all the other documentaries are his own work makes it a bit misleading too. Richard001 ( talk) 07:16, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
Should these be included? Richard001 ( talk) 00:19, 19 October 2009 (UTC)