I am not sure that I like the following change in definition from:
to:
The problem with the new definition is that it is circular. The definition is used to define itself, which is not very helpful. Please note that the intended audience for the glossary is the lay public and not molecular biologists. I propose that the definition be restored to the old one, but I am certainly open to suggestions about how to improve it. Cheers. Boghog2 ( talk) 23:27, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
The definition for restriction site states, "The DNA sequence that is cleaved by the restriction enzyme in america." I don't understand what america has to do with restriction sites. Elfalem ( talk) 20:59, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
I am not sure that I like the following change in definition from:
to:
The problem with the new definition is that it is circular. The definition is used to define itself, which is not very helpful. Please note that the intended audience for the glossary is the lay public and not molecular biologists. I propose that the definition be restored to the old one, but I am certainly open to suggestions about how to improve it. Cheers. Boghog2 ( talk) 23:27, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
The definition for restriction site states, "The DNA sequence that is cleaved by the restriction enzyme in america." I don't understand what america has to do with restriction sites. Elfalem ( talk) 20:59, 8 October 2009 (UTC)