The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. ( non-admin closure) Steel1943 ( talk) 16:51, 22 September 2017 (UTC) reply

Template:German Regionalliga (football) → Template:Regionalliga – Align template name with the article title, Regionalliga.  S.A. Julio ( talk) 13:38, 14 September 2017 (UTC) reply

This is a contested technical request ( permalink). TonyBallioni ( talk) 15:34, 14 September 2017 (UTC) reply

• S.A. Julio, pageswap has notified that this is a heavily transcluded template. As such, I think its best to exercise caution here and give a comment period through an RM. I'll notify the WikiProject as well. This is a purely procedural actions, and I am neutral. TonyBallioni ( talk) 15:34, 14 September 2017 (UTC) reply
• Support Per article name. Kante4 ( talk) 15:41, 14 September 2017 (UTC) reply
• Support Per article name. Why this is a contested discussion when there is no actual opposition is beyond me. -- SuperJew ( talk) 16:03, 14 September 2017 (UTC) reply
  • The template says that, but its default language from the link that starts the RM. WP:RM/TR is only for requests where there is unlikely to be any opposition. Admins and page movers will frequently send a request to an RM if they are unsure if there would be consensus. In this case, the template was highly transcluded: having a discussion before moving such a visible template ensures that the move is actually in line with consensus, rather than using a low visibility process. TonyBallioni ( talk) 17:13, 14 September 2017 (UTC) reply

The template is used on only 13 articles, does not seem "highly transcluded" to me. S.A. Julio ( talk) 17:18, 14 September 2017 (UTC) reply

Seems like needless bureaucracy to me. If someone actually opposes they'll contest it, otherwise there's no problem and should be allowed to be done with minimum of fuss. -- SuperJew ( talk) 21:02, 14 September 2017 (UTC) reply

• Support Per article name. -- Jaellee ( talk) 16:07, 14 September 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.