This page is within the scope of WikiProject Redirect, a collaborative effort to improve the standard of
redirects and their
categorization on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the
discussion and see a list of open tasks. Note: This banner should be placed on the talk pages of project, template and category pages that exist and operate to maintain redirects. This banner is not designed to be placed on the talk pages of most redirects and almost never on the talk pages of
mainspace redirects. For more information see the template documentation.RedirectWikipedia:WikiProject RedirectTemplate:WikiProject Redirectredirect pages
Yes, that is definitely appropriate use of this rcat. Good catch! and Happy New Year,
djr13! – Paine EllsworthCLIMAX! 16:51, 31 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Here is a little tip that might help you in the future,
djr13:
When you come across a "naked" redirect like the one you caught above, if you tag it with the {{This is a redirect}} template, or its alias {{Redr}} you can get help that way, too. For example, say you make the edit page look like this:
#REDIRECT [[U.S. Steel]]
{{Redr}}
or, if you feel bolder, then like this:
#REDIRECT [[U.S. Steel]]
{{Redr||to initialism}}
(Note the two "pipes" after "Redr", which just means "an empty first parameter".) Either way, the redirect will be sorted to a category called
Miscellaneous redirects. Some editors including myself monitor that category just in case other editors need help to categorize redirects. So feel free to use that in the future when you're not quite sure. Joys! – Paine 17:26, 31 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Thanks! As tempting as it may be though, I think I'll have to keep this to a minimum. I'm rarely absolutely sure I've tagged a redirect with all/only appropriate tags, and if I add this whenever I'm not totally sure, I would just be replacing one backlog with another. :)
djr13 (
talk) 17:37, 31 December 2014 (UTC)reply
I understand your feelings; let me reassure you that several editors watch that misc. category, so there is rarely if ever a backlog. But you do as you wish, my friend.
– Paine 18:57, 31 December 2014 (UTC)reply
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Redirect, a collaborative effort to improve the standard of
redirects and their
categorization on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the
discussion and see a list of open tasks. Note: This banner should be placed on the talk pages of project, template and category pages that exist and operate to maintain redirects. This banner is not designed to be placed on the talk pages of most redirects and almost never on the talk pages of
mainspace redirects. For more information see the template documentation.RedirectWikipedia:WikiProject RedirectTemplate:WikiProject Redirectredirect pages
Yes, that is definitely appropriate use of this rcat. Good catch! and Happy New Year,
djr13! – Paine EllsworthCLIMAX! 16:51, 31 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Here is a little tip that might help you in the future,
djr13:
When you come across a "naked" redirect like the one you caught above, if you tag it with the {{This is a redirect}} template, or its alias {{Redr}} you can get help that way, too. For example, say you make the edit page look like this:
#REDIRECT [[U.S. Steel]]
{{Redr}}
or, if you feel bolder, then like this:
#REDIRECT [[U.S. Steel]]
{{Redr||to initialism}}
(Note the two "pipes" after "Redr", which just means "an empty first parameter".) Either way, the redirect will be sorted to a category called
Miscellaneous redirects. Some editors including myself monitor that category just in case other editors need help to categorize redirects. So feel free to use that in the future when you're not quite sure. Joys! – Paine 17:26, 31 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Thanks! As tempting as it may be though, I think I'll have to keep this to a minimum. I'm rarely absolutely sure I've tagged a redirect with all/only appropriate tags, and if I add this whenever I'm not totally sure, I would just be replacing one backlog with another. :)
djr13 (
talk) 17:37, 31 December 2014 (UTC)reply
I understand your feelings; let me reassure you that several editors watch that misc. category, so there is rarely if ever a backlog. But you do as you wish, my friend.
– Paine 18:57, 31 December 2014 (UTC)reply