Template:R printworthy is permanently
protected from editing because it is a
heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by
consensus, editors may use {{
edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's
documentation to add usage notes or
categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. This template does not have a testcases subpage. You can create the testcases subpage here. |
Redirect Template‑class | |||||||
|
This template was considered for deletion on 2010 August 25. The result of the discussion was "keep". |
What is the point of this template? The page does not explain what it does so all I can gather from it is it adds Category:Printworthy redirects. Why do we need a template to add a category? Isn't it much easier just to add the category? McLerristarr (Mclay1) ( talk) 07:48, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
The {{ R unprintworthy}} template has long been set to be used only in the Main article namespace by using the {{ Main other}} template. To standardize this template with the R unprintworthy template, I added the Main other template to this template. – PIE ( CLIMAX ) 18:23, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
This gives redirects four options:
My suggestion is to get rid of printworthy template, mark redirects as unprintworthy if they are, and assume unmarked redirects are printworthy. Currently I don't know what (1) and (4) means. -- JBrown23 ( talk) 17:18, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
I don't understand the intended purpose of this template. It says things like "a title that would be helpful in a printed or CD/DVD version of Wikipedia" but what does that mean? How would the redirect be used in a printed encyclopedia? I supposed I've always imagined that it's something that should appear in the index of the printed copy which then points to the redirect target. Otherwise I'm not sure how I'd be used. Jason Quinn ( talk) 12:15, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Template:R printworthy is permanently
protected from editing because it is a
heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by
consensus, editors may use {{
edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's
documentation to add usage notes or
categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. This template does not have a testcases subpage. You can create the testcases subpage here. |
Redirect Template‑class | |||||||
|
This template was considered for deletion on 2010 August 25. The result of the discussion was "keep". |
What is the point of this template? The page does not explain what it does so all I can gather from it is it adds Category:Printworthy redirects. Why do we need a template to add a category? Isn't it much easier just to add the category? McLerristarr (Mclay1) ( talk) 07:48, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
The {{ R unprintworthy}} template has long been set to be used only in the Main article namespace by using the {{ Main other}} template. To standardize this template with the R unprintworthy template, I added the Main other template to this template. – PIE ( CLIMAX ) 18:23, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
This gives redirects four options:
My suggestion is to get rid of printworthy template, mark redirects as unprintworthy if they are, and assume unmarked redirects are printworthy. Currently I don't know what (1) and (4) means. -- JBrown23 ( talk) 17:18, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
I don't understand the intended purpose of this template. It says things like "a title that would be helpful in a printed or CD/DVD version of Wikipedia" but what does that mean? How would the redirect be used in a printed encyclopedia? I supposed I've always imagined that it's something that should appear in the index of the printed copy which then points to the redirect target. Otherwise I'm not sure how I'd be used. Jason Quinn ( talk) 12:15, 25 September 2016 (UTC)