Template:R from railroad name with ampersand is permanently
protected from editing because it is a
heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by
consensus, editors may use {{
edit extended-protected}} to notify an administrator, template editor or extended-confirmed editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's
documentation to add usage notes or
categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. This template does not have a testcases subpage. You can create the testcases subpage here. |
Redirect Template‑class | |||||||
|
To editor Fabartus: the printability or printworthiness of a redirect has nothing to do with whether or not it is a good search term. We tag redirects as "printworthy" if we want them to be included in a printed version of Wikipedia, and we tag them as "unprintworthy" if we don't want them included. Readers of a printed version who would search the index for, say, "Denver & Rio Grande" would easily find it under "Denver and Rio Grande", and that goes for all the railroad names. In researching this, I did happen across a redirect that should be printworthy because it is a former name, so I will alter this rcat to default to unprintworthy and allow for some redirects to be printworthy. Paine Ellsworth put'r there 04:47, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
@ Paine Ellsworth: :OK, thanks for the due diligence. Perhaps there has been a system software change that altered my findings of way back (? 2008-2010 daze?). Thanks for the well wishes, I'm well enough, but had a minor coronary infarction in January, and some disparate symptoms seemed they might be another cardiac event early in the week. Hence a double-dip nuclear image stress test. At least I caught up on my sleep for once! // Fra nkB 00:50, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Template:R from railroad name with ampersand is permanently
protected from editing because it is a
heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by
consensus, editors may use {{
edit extended-protected}} to notify an administrator, template editor or extended-confirmed editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's
documentation to add usage notes or
categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. This template does not have a testcases subpage. You can create the testcases subpage here. |
Redirect Template‑class | |||||||
|
To editor Fabartus: the printability or printworthiness of a redirect has nothing to do with whether or not it is a good search term. We tag redirects as "printworthy" if we want them to be included in a printed version of Wikipedia, and we tag them as "unprintworthy" if we don't want them included. Readers of a printed version who would search the index for, say, "Denver & Rio Grande" would easily find it under "Denver and Rio Grande", and that goes for all the railroad names. In researching this, I did happen across a redirect that should be printworthy because it is a former name, so I will alter this rcat to default to unprintworthy and allow for some redirects to be printworthy. Paine Ellsworth put'r there 04:47, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
@ Paine Ellsworth: :OK, thanks for the due diligence. Perhaps there has been a system software change that altered my findings of way back (? 2008-2010 daze?). Thanks for the well wishes, I'm well enough, but had a minor coronary infarction in January, and some disparate symptoms seemed they might be another cardiac event early in the week. Hence a double-dip nuclear image stress test. At least I caught up on my sleep for once! // Fra nkB 00:50, 30 March 2017 (UTC)