Pinging MusikAnimal, posting it here since I don't know for sure if there is a better place. Currently it is possible to transclude editnotices on pages containing certain categories by way of MediaWiki:Common.js code; for example, the Template:BLP editintro edit notice is automatically displayed on pages containing Category:Living people and Category:Possibly living people through a JS rule on Common.js. Maybe one could make pages containing this template automatically display an edit notice through JS. I am noting this here since some users did note that Abuse Filter does not pre-warn editors that edits to a page will not be allowed, so someone might make an edit to a page and expending effort only to lose all of that when they try to save. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 11:36, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Template:Pp-30-500 has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Now that an actual protection level has been made, the wikilink should be changed from WP:AC/DS to Wikipedia:Protection policy#Arbitration 30/500 protection. I have sandboxed my proposed change here: Template:Pp-30-500/sandbox. Mz7 ( talk) 20:28, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
I can't help with this, as I don't know many things about templates, but it is not displaying in categories. See Category:Temple Mount for an example. © Tbhotch ™ ( en-2.5). 22:11, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Is the Lua module not updated yet, or did no one change this template to have {{#invoke:Protection banner|main}}? Datbubblegumdoe talk – contribs 23:23, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
|small=yes
didn't work, for one, and the full-length banner implied full protection and not 30/500. Pinging
Jackmcbarn as I know he did some work for this —
MusikAnimal
talk 23:45, 26 April 2016 (UTC)This template should detect incorrect usage, just as the other prot icon templates do, in order to pick up edits like this one by SSTflyer ( talk · contribs) - Jerusalem has been semi-protected since 05:19, 28 February 2011, and has never been 30/500 prot. -- Redrose64 ( talk) 13:30, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Template:Pp-30-500 has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I would remove [[
Category:Wikipedia pages under discretionary sanctions]]
from the template. The protection level has now been applied to pages beyond arbitration discretionary sanctions, such as
Disgusting and
this ANI thread. Additionally,
WP:ECP2016 looks like its about to authorize administrators to use it within their discretion just like semi- and full-protection.
Mz7 ( talk) 20:09, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
{{#invoke:Protection banner|main}}
like the others and not worry about categories, wording, etc. It's not ready to be synced yet. It's possible that we might need two pp templates, one more ArbCom specific, and one for "general-purpose" that we title "pp-ecp", but I'm planning to discuss this with
Mr. Stradivarius before I proceed. —
Andy W. (
talk ·
ctb) 04:29, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Moved due to no opposition — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 11:46, 30 October 2019 (UTC) — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 11:46, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
– The 30-500 is a relic from before extended confirmed rights and protection was a thing, since the protection level now is usually referred to as extended confirmed protection a move is in order. Pp-extended was chosen for conciseness while Ds/extended-confirmed-editnotice was chosen to avoid ambiguity, which isn't required for the pp template as pp already gives context. This proposal was promted by a recent CfD changing the category name. -- Trialpears ( talk) 16:37, 14 October 2019 (UTC) --Relisting. Sceptre ( talk) 21:38, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add something that detects the page is a talk page, it's weird seeing EC-protected talk pages saying Please discuss any changes on the talk page; you may submit an edit request to ask for uncontroversial changes supported by consensus when you can't make one. 🔥 Lightning Complex Fire🔥 15:40, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Pinging MusikAnimal, posting it here since I don't know for sure if there is a better place. Currently it is possible to transclude editnotices on pages containing certain categories by way of MediaWiki:Common.js code; for example, the Template:BLP editintro edit notice is automatically displayed on pages containing Category:Living people and Category:Possibly living people through a JS rule on Common.js. Maybe one could make pages containing this template automatically display an edit notice through JS. I am noting this here since some users did note that Abuse Filter does not pre-warn editors that edits to a page will not be allowed, so someone might make an edit to a page and expending effort only to lose all of that when they try to save. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 11:36, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Template:Pp-30-500 has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Now that an actual protection level has been made, the wikilink should be changed from WP:AC/DS to Wikipedia:Protection policy#Arbitration 30/500 protection. I have sandboxed my proposed change here: Template:Pp-30-500/sandbox. Mz7 ( talk) 20:28, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
I can't help with this, as I don't know many things about templates, but it is not displaying in categories. See Category:Temple Mount for an example. © Tbhotch ™ ( en-2.5). 22:11, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Is the Lua module not updated yet, or did no one change this template to have {{#invoke:Protection banner|main}}? Datbubblegumdoe talk – contribs 23:23, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
|small=yes
didn't work, for one, and the full-length banner implied full protection and not 30/500. Pinging
Jackmcbarn as I know he did some work for this —
MusikAnimal
talk 23:45, 26 April 2016 (UTC)This template should detect incorrect usage, just as the other prot icon templates do, in order to pick up edits like this one by SSTflyer ( talk · contribs) - Jerusalem has been semi-protected since 05:19, 28 February 2011, and has never been 30/500 prot. -- Redrose64 ( talk) 13:30, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Template:Pp-30-500 has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I would remove [[
Category:Wikipedia pages under discretionary sanctions]]
from the template. The protection level has now been applied to pages beyond arbitration discretionary sanctions, such as
Disgusting and
this ANI thread. Additionally,
WP:ECP2016 looks like its about to authorize administrators to use it within their discretion just like semi- and full-protection.
Mz7 ( talk) 20:09, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
{{#invoke:Protection banner|main}}
like the others and not worry about categories, wording, etc. It's not ready to be synced yet. It's possible that we might need two pp templates, one more ArbCom specific, and one for "general-purpose" that we title "pp-ecp", but I'm planning to discuss this with
Mr. Stradivarius before I proceed. —
Andy W. (
talk ·
ctb) 04:29, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Moved due to no opposition — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 11:46, 30 October 2019 (UTC) — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 11:46, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
– The 30-500 is a relic from before extended confirmed rights and protection was a thing, since the protection level now is usually referred to as extended confirmed protection a move is in order. Pp-extended was chosen for conciseness while Ds/extended-confirmed-editnotice was chosen to avoid ambiguity, which isn't required for the pp template as pp already gives context. This proposal was promted by a recent CfD changing the category name. -- Trialpears ( talk) 16:37, 14 October 2019 (UTC) --Relisting. Sceptre ( talk) 21:38, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add something that detects the page is a talk page, it's weird seeing EC-protected talk pages saying Please discuss any changes on the talk page; you may submit an edit request to ask for uncontroversial changes supported by consensus when you can't make one. 🔥 Lightning Complex Fire🔥 15:40, 8 January 2021 (UTC)