![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
For all the entries except 2-4, the names constitute original research, and the redirect for 1- is inappropriate. The template makes sense, but the names should be revoked. I don't want to, even temporarily, damage the template by putting the appropriate {{ or}} tags inside, but something needs to be done. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 16:11, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
I think we can borrow details from this table
Family n |
An n- Simplex |
BCn n- Hypercube n- Orthoplex |
Dn n- Demicube |
En 1k2, 2k1, k21 |
F4 | Hn |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 |
triangle (2-simplex) |
Square | x | x | x | Pentagon |
3 |
Tetrahedron (3-simplex) |
Cube Octahedron |
Demicube (Tetrahedron) |
x | x |
Dodecahedron Icosahedron |
4 |
5-cell (4-simplex) |
Tesseract 16-cell |
Demitesseract (16-cell) |
x | 24-cell |
120-cell 600-cell |
5 | 5-simplex |
Penteract Pentacross |
Demipenteract | x | x | x |
6 | 6-simplex |
Hexeract Hexacross |
Demihexeract | 122 221 | x | x |
7 | 7-simplex |
Hepteract Heptacross |
Demihepteract | 132 231 321 | x | x |
8 | 8-simplex |
Octeract Octacross |
Demiocteract | 142 241 421 | x | x |
9 | 9-simplex |
Enneract Enneacross |
Demienneract | x | x | x |
10 | 10-simplex |
Dekeract Decacross |
Demidekeract | x | x | x |
Mateus Zica ( talk) 23:45, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
n | n- Simplex | n- Hypercube • n- Orthoplex | n- Demicube | 1k2 • 2k1 • k21 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Family | An | BCn | Dn | En | F4 | Hn | |||||||
2-polytope | 2-simplex | Square | Pentagon | ||||||||||
3-polytope | 3-simplex | Cube • Octahedron | Demicube ( Tetrahedron) | Dodecahedron • Icosahedron | |||||||||
4-polytope | 4-simplex | Tesseract • 16-cell | demitesseract (16-cell) | 24-cell | 120-cell • 600-cell | ||||||||
5-polytope | 5-simplex | 5-cube • 5-orthoplex | 5-demicube | ||||||||||
6-polytope | 6-simplex | 6-cube • 6-orthoplex | 6-demicube | 122 • 221 | |||||||||
7-polytope | 7-simplex | 7-cube • 7-orthoplex | 7-demicube | 132 • 231 • 321 | |||||||||
8-polytope | 8-simplex | 8-cube • 8-orthoplex | 8-demicube | 142 • 241 • 421 | |||||||||
9-polytope | 9-simplex | 9-cube • 9-orthoplex | 9-demicube | ||||||||||
10-polytope | 10-simplex | 10-cube • 10-orthoplex | 10-demicube |
i made a new simplier version Mateus Zica ( talk) 15:51, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
New version :
Mateus Zica ( talk) 14:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
From User:4 (including star polytopes)
From User:Tomruen (Variation of option 2 format, but focus on groups)
Looking at it now after the changes by User:Yaoliding it is much too wide: somewhere around 1400 px with my default, very small, font size. The point of a navigation template is navigation. The extra names should be handled in the articles or, if they are common enough that they might be searched for, in redirects.-- JohnBlackburne words deeds 13:44, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
Again there are problems with the recent changes, for example
More generally there's a problem with the number of edits and lack of edit summaries. If you want to edit an article please use the preview button to see your changes before submitting them, rather than only checking after submitting, and provide proper edit summaries to explain what your changes are.-- JohnBlackburne words deeds 13:14, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
The redlinks have gone but
-- JohnBlackburne words deeds 15:16, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
Oh...So, is it wrong to add "p-gon" and the others in the templete? I wish you can help to edit according your opinion. After all, it;s very difficult for me to read and express in English. Sorry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yaoliding ( talk • contribs) 16:12, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
You can just post them to WP:RM, which has instructions and a couple of examples. Or you could just move them: there's no requirement if it's a relatively uncontroversial move.-- JohnBlackburne words deeds 17:49, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
I regrouped the Exceptional Lie_groups together in one column, and this allowed G2 to be added. I didn't know Hn Coxeter groups are not included as Lie groups, apparently because they can't tessellate space. So I linked all the group titles, except Hn at the end! Tom Ruen ( talk) 01:46, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
Although G2, F4 and E6~E8 are Exceptional Lie groups, but these three groups have a lot of difference, they don't have the simple connection. It's inappropriate to put them in the same column. Er...By the way, why the line "n-polytope" was in the bottom of the form? Actually the polytope of E2,E3,E4,E5 is in exist(F2 as well), even they are not exceptional Lie groups。 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yaoliding ( talk • contribs) 05:20, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
I added an In(p) column to the template. Also, I was wondering if something like Schläfli symbols or Coxeter-Dynkin diagrams would be a good thing to include or if it would make the template too cluttered. Aacehm (talk) 19:54, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi guys. I started this question on Quora:
And this calculator on Google Sheets:
They are good points to help the improvement of this article. The table could be expanded to help comparision between all shapes.-- TudorTulok ( talk) 22:15, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
For all the entries except 2-4, the names constitute original research, and the redirect for 1- is inappropriate. The template makes sense, but the names should be revoked. I don't want to, even temporarily, damage the template by putting the appropriate {{ or}} tags inside, but something needs to be done. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 16:11, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
I think we can borrow details from this table
Family n |
An n- Simplex |
BCn n- Hypercube n- Orthoplex |
Dn n- Demicube |
En 1k2, 2k1, k21 |
F4 | Hn |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 |
triangle (2-simplex) |
Square | x | x | x | Pentagon |
3 |
Tetrahedron (3-simplex) |
Cube Octahedron |
Demicube (Tetrahedron) |
x | x |
Dodecahedron Icosahedron |
4 |
5-cell (4-simplex) |
Tesseract 16-cell |
Demitesseract (16-cell) |
x | 24-cell |
120-cell 600-cell |
5 | 5-simplex |
Penteract Pentacross |
Demipenteract | x | x | x |
6 | 6-simplex |
Hexeract Hexacross |
Demihexeract | 122 221 | x | x |
7 | 7-simplex |
Hepteract Heptacross |
Demihepteract | 132 231 321 | x | x |
8 | 8-simplex |
Octeract Octacross |
Demiocteract | 142 241 421 | x | x |
9 | 9-simplex |
Enneract Enneacross |
Demienneract | x | x | x |
10 | 10-simplex |
Dekeract Decacross |
Demidekeract | x | x | x |
Mateus Zica ( talk) 23:45, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
n | n- Simplex | n- Hypercube • n- Orthoplex | n- Demicube | 1k2 • 2k1 • k21 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Family | An | BCn | Dn | En | F4 | Hn | |||||||
2-polytope | 2-simplex | Square | Pentagon | ||||||||||
3-polytope | 3-simplex | Cube • Octahedron | Demicube ( Tetrahedron) | Dodecahedron • Icosahedron | |||||||||
4-polytope | 4-simplex | Tesseract • 16-cell | demitesseract (16-cell) | 24-cell | 120-cell • 600-cell | ||||||||
5-polytope | 5-simplex | 5-cube • 5-orthoplex | 5-demicube | ||||||||||
6-polytope | 6-simplex | 6-cube • 6-orthoplex | 6-demicube | 122 • 221 | |||||||||
7-polytope | 7-simplex | 7-cube • 7-orthoplex | 7-demicube | 132 • 231 • 321 | |||||||||
8-polytope | 8-simplex | 8-cube • 8-orthoplex | 8-demicube | 142 • 241 • 421 | |||||||||
9-polytope | 9-simplex | 9-cube • 9-orthoplex | 9-demicube | ||||||||||
10-polytope | 10-simplex | 10-cube • 10-orthoplex | 10-demicube |
i made a new simplier version Mateus Zica ( talk) 15:51, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
New version :
Mateus Zica ( talk) 14:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
From User:4 (including star polytopes)
From User:Tomruen (Variation of option 2 format, but focus on groups)
Looking at it now after the changes by User:Yaoliding it is much too wide: somewhere around 1400 px with my default, very small, font size. The point of a navigation template is navigation. The extra names should be handled in the articles or, if they are common enough that they might be searched for, in redirects.-- JohnBlackburne words deeds 13:44, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
Again there are problems with the recent changes, for example
More generally there's a problem with the number of edits and lack of edit summaries. If you want to edit an article please use the preview button to see your changes before submitting them, rather than only checking after submitting, and provide proper edit summaries to explain what your changes are.-- JohnBlackburne words deeds 13:14, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
The redlinks have gone but
-- JohnBlackburne words deeds 15:16, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
Oh...So, is it wrong to add "p-gon" and the others in the templete? I wish you can help to edit according your opinion. After all, it;s very difficult for me to read and express in English. Sorry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yaoliding ( talk • contribs) 16:12, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
You can just post them to WP:RM, which has instructions and a couple of examples. Or you could just move them: there's no requirement if it's a relatively uncontroversial move.-- JohnBlackburne words deeds 17:49, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
I regrouped the Exceptional Lie_groups together in one column, and this allowed G2 to be added. I didn't know Hn Coxeter groups are not included as Lie groups, apparently because they can't tessellate space. So I linked all the group titles, except Hn at the end! Tom Ruen ( talk) 01:46, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
Although G2, F4 and E6~E8 are Exceptional Lie groups, but these three groups have a lot of difference, they don't have the simple connection. It's inappropriate to put them in the same column. Er...By the way, why the line "n-polytope" was in the bottom of the form? Actually the polytope of E2,E3,E4,E5 is in exist(F2 as well), even they are not exceptional Lie groups。 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yaoliding ( talk • contribs) 05:20, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
I added an In(p) column to the template. Also, I was wondering if something like Schläfli symbols or Coxeter-Dynkin diagrams would be a good thing to include or if it would make the template too cluttered. Aacehm (talk) 19:54, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi guys. I started this question on Quora:
And this calculator on Google Sheets:
They are good points to help the improvement of this article. The table could be expanded to help comparision between all shapes.-- TudorTulok ( talk) 22:15, 12 October 2014 (UTC)