From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

More stakes

Under former and defunct JVs and shareholdings, shouldn't we list the following companies?

The Seventh Taylor ( talk) 00:39, 2 October 2012 (UTC) reply

Sure, why not. Rangoon11 ( talk) 00:44, 2 October 2012 (UTC) reply
Done. The Seventh Taylor ( talk) 01:26, 30 December 2012 (UTC) reply

B&O

user:R'n'B wrote: there is nothing in either the Philips or Bang & Olufsen articles documenting any joint venture or ownership relation between the two companies.

You may be right here. I also cannot find evidence of it elsewhere, other than a "strategic alliance" which apparently involved a temporary flow of money from Philips to B&O. [1] The Seventh Taylor ( talk) 04:43, 3 January 2013 (UTC) reply

Overstyling

I have fixed the overstyling per WP:DEVIATIONS and to match the format used by Template:Siemens and all the others. Frietjes ( talk) 21:02, 14 September 2017 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

More stakes

Under former and defunct JVs and shareholdings, shouldn't we list the following companies?

The Seventh Taylor ( talk) 00:39, 2 October 2012 (UTC) reply

Sure, why not. Rangoon11 ( talk) 00:44, 2 October 2012 (UTC) reply
Done. The Seventh Taylor ( talk) 01:26, 30 December 2012 (UTC) reply

B&O

user:R'n'B wrote: there is nothing in either the Philips or Bang & Olufsen articles documenting any joint venture or ownership relation between the two companies.

You may be right here. I also cannot find evidence of it elsewhere, other than a "strategic alliance" which apparently involved a temporary flow of money from Philips to B&O. [1] The Seventh Taylor ( talk) 04:43, 3 January 2013 (UTC) reply

Overstyling

I have fixed the overstyling per WP:DEVIATIONS and to match the format used by Template:Siemens and all the others. Frietjes ( talk) 21:02, 14 September 2017 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook