Film: American Template‑class | ||||||||||
|
How about having the "Director" and "Other" rows but not the "Associates" or "See also", which are a little more tangential? — Erik ( talk • contrib) 17:10, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
May I note this edit summary: were discussing please dont revet again until the discussion finishe was inappropriate since Yankees is the one who changed it in the first place. If I can suggest a compromise, the third field could be called "Companies" and link all three divisions of Weta. Alientraveller ( talk) 17:24, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Let's work with the above template... it's roughly in the middle of two sides. Alientraveller, do you really think we need the associates or "see also"? Yankees10, do you really think we need separation by decade or excluding the video game for which Peter Jackson has a prominent role? — Erik ( talk • contrib) 17:29, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Now may I note that this user clearly has a control and ownership issue over this template, considering if you look at the history he reverts edits nearly every time someone other then himself tries to edit it. Just thought I would let people be aware-- Yankees10 17:30, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
I propose we seperate the other projects into their own group depending on the role he played in the film - "Production credits" , "Writer" , etc. Thoughts? - Cartoon Boy ( talk) 6:27, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
I just looked at the official website and I saw that Peter Jackson has nothing to do with with it's ownership and leadership of Weta Workshop.And that is why I am asking if the page Weta Workshop should be removed from the template about Peter Jackson or not and if not, why. Γιάννης Ευαγγελίου ( talk) 16:11, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
Film: American Template‑class | ||||||||||
|
How about having the "Director" and "Other" rows but not the "Associates" or "See also", which are a little more tangential? — Erik ( talk • contrib) 17:10, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
May I note this edit summary: were discussing please dont revet again until the discussion finishe was inappropriate since Yankees is the one who changed it in the first place. If I can suggest a compromise, the third field could be called "Companies" and link all three divisions of Weta. Alientraveller ( talk) 17:24, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Let's work with the above template... it's roughly in the middle of two sides. Alientraveller, do you really think we need the associates or "see also"? Yankees10, do you really think we need separation by decade or excluding the video game for which Peter Jackson has a prominent role? — Erik ( talk • contrib) 17:29, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Now may I note that this user clearly has a control and ownership issue over this template, considering if you look at the history he reverts edits nearly every time someone other then himself tries to edit it. Just thought I would let people be aware-- Yankees10 17:30, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
I propose we seperate the other projects into their own group depending on the role he played in the film - "Production credits" , "Writer" , etc. Thoughts? - Cartoon Boy ( talk) 6:27, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
I just looked at the official website and I saw that Peter Jackson has nothing to do with with it's ownership and leadership of Weta Workshop.And that is why I am asking if the page Weta Workshop should be removed from the template about Peter Jackson or not and if not, why. Γιάννης Ευαγγελίου ( talk) 16:11, 19 October 2022 (UTC)