![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Forgot to mention in edit history that this is based on de:Vorlage:Periodensystem. All I did was translate it. -- mav ( talk) 16:52, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
The infoboxes for these respective elements ( Meitnerium, Darmstadtium, Roentgenium), as well as the main periodic table article, have these color-coded as transition metals. Even if that color-coding is not yet based on conclusive research, given the properties of elements 108 and 112, it's a fairly reasonable prediction. I've changed this navigational aid to match the actual articles on the subject. If anyone has a problem with that, take it up on the main articles first. — Gordon P. Hemsley→ ✉ 18:08, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
I raised a question at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Metalloid/archive3#Comment from Designate regarding the assignment of At/Po on this chart. It seems to contradict the main chart at Metalloid (which lists both as "Inconsistently classified as metalloids") and the individual pages for Astatine and Polonium. I don't have a chemistry degree so I'm just throwing this out there. I know these designations are fuzzy. It just seems like the four pages could be synchronized a little better. — Designate ( talk) 16:16, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
@
TheDJ: Could you replace padding:0;" | {{
with padding:0.04em;" | {{
(118×) in order to have padding between cells? After the last edit (that was for normalizing infobox width) padding disappeared even in Chrome (before this edit it was not present only on mobile view in all browsers and in IE both on desktop and mobile; if we add explicit 0.04em it will be present in all cases; I don't know even how it appeared before, maybe cellspacing was making it). --
5.43.78.13 (
talk)
14:04, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Forgot to mention in edit history that this is based on de:Vorlage:Periodensystem. All I did was translate it. -- mav ( talk) 16:52, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
The infoboxes for these respective elements ( Meitnerium, Darmstadtium, Roentgenium), as well as the main periodic table article, have these color-coded as transition metals. Even if that color-coding is not yet based on conclusive research, given the properties of elements 108 and 112, it's a fairly reasonable prediction. I've changed this navigational aid to match the actual articles on the subject. If anyone has a problem with that, take it up on the main articles first. — Gordon P. Hemsley→ ✉ 18:08, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
I raised a question at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Metalloid/archive3#Comment from Designate regarding the assignment of At/Po on this chart. It seems to contradict the main chart at Metalloid (which lists both as "Inconsistently classified as metalloids") and the individual pages for Astatine and Polonium. I don't have a chemistry degree so I'm just throwing this out there. I know these designations are fuzzy. It just seems like the four pages could be synchronized a little better. — Designate ( talk) 16:16, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
@
TheDJ: Could you replace padding:0;" | {{
with padding:0.04em;" | {{
(118×) in order to have padding between cells? After the last edit (that was for normalizing infobox width) padding disappeared even in Chrome (before this edit it was not present only on mobile view in all browsers and in IE both on desktop and mobile; if we add explicit 0.04em it will be present in all cases; I don't know even how it appeared before, maybe cellspacing was making it). --
5.43.78.13 (
talk)
14:04, 27 June 2017 (UTC)