From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Should the Uw-ublock template be below the actual template on the page? I didn't want to delete it in case it should be there and since it has been there since 27 July 2013. -- Seagull123 ( talk) 23:06, 7 April 2015 (UTC) reply

As per my comment above, should the Uw-ublock template be on this template? I'm not sure who added it; but AnomieBOT substed it (see diff below). What should happen?

[1]
-- Seagull123 ( talk) 19:21, 12 June 2015 (UTC) reply

That was vandalism the bot didn't recognize. It wasn't reverted earlier because it was within <noinclude> tags and thus didn't alter the appearance of the template in articlespace; it only broke the categorization. Huon ( talk) 19:30, 12 June 2015 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Should the Uw-ublock template be below the actual template on the page? I didn't want to delete it in case it should be there and since it has been there since 27 July 2013. -- Seagull123 ( talk) 23:06, 7 April 2015 (UTC) reply

As per my comment above, should the Uw-ublock template be on this template? I'm not sure who added it; but AnomieBOT substed it (see diff below). What should happen?

[1]
-- Seagull123 ( talk) 19:21, 12 June 2015 (UTC) reply

That was vandalism the bot didn't recognize. It wasn't reverted earlier because it was within <noinclude> tags and thus didn't alter the appearance of the template in articlespace; it only broke the categorization. Huon ( talk) 19:30, 12 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook