Template:PD-US-expired-abroad is permanently
protected from editing because it is a
heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by
consensus, editors may use {{
edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's
documentation to add usage notes or
categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. Functionality of the template can be checked using test cases. |
Does anyone know why the 9th circuit restriction is on this tag? IronGargoyle ( talk) 16:22, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
RE 'what's my goal': I want images that aren't suitable for Commons to appear in Category:Media not suitable for Commons, which is useful for tooling. I thought both my attempts were fine—I don't think that the category is specifically for that one template since it's got a nice and generic name and I couldn't figure out what the issue with pdsource was, and I think the wording of {{Do not move to Commons}} and the template's current wording is close enough to make no difference—but I'm going to have another go now, similar to the last one, and specifically mention verifying source PD status. If that's unsatisfactory, could you ( User:RP88) please have a go at doing that in a better way? Facing the Sky ( talk) 05:44, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
{{ #if:{{{out_of_copyright_in|{{{1|}}}}}} <!-- Parameter checking, not template call. --> | {{ out_of_copyright_in | {{{ out_of_copyright_in | {{{1|}}} }}} }} <!-- No call to {{Do not move to commons}} in this branch. --> | {{Free in US media}} {{Do not move to Commons}} <!-- No call to {{out of copyright in}} in this branch. --> }}
Can an admin or template edtiopr review the changes in {{ PD-US-1923-abroad/sandbox}} against the sandbox and swap them into the main template to restore some functionality that appeared to have got lost in some past editing?. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 20:18, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 20:19, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
This template should be renamed "PD-US-1924-abroad". Jonghyunchung ( talk) 09:30, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
It is publish+120 years If the date of death of the author is unknown,but If that date is know,It will always be life+70 years SigmaAnt ( talk) 13:33, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The call to the template {{ Out of copyright in}} needs replacing with {{ Copy to Wikimedia Commons in}}, as there has been a successful merge request. Xeroctic ( talk) 16:13, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Template:PD-US-expired-abroad is permanently
protected from editing because it is a
heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by
consensus, editors may use {{
edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's
documentation to add usage notes or
categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. Functionality of the template can be checked using test cases. |
Does anyone know why the 9th circuit restriction is on this tag? IronGargoyle ( talk) 16:22, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
RE 'what's my goal': I want images that aren't suitable for Commons to appear in Category:Media not suitable for Commons, which is useful for tooling. I thought both my attempts were fine—I don't think that the category is specifically for that one template since it's got a nice and generic name and I couldn't figure out what the issue with pdsource was, and I think the wording of {{Do not move to Commons}} and the template's current wording is close enough to make no difference—but I'm going to have another go now, similar to the last one, and specifically mention verifying source PD status. If that's unsatisfactory, could you ( User:RP88) please have a go at doing that in a better way? Facing the Sky ( talk) 05:44, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
{{ #if:{{{out_of_copyright_in|{{{1|}}}}}} <!-- Parameter checking, not template call. --> | {{ out_of_copyright_in | {{{ out_of_copyright_in | {{{1|}}} }}} }} <!-- No call to {{Do not move to commons}} in this branch. --> | {{Free in US media}} {{Do not move to Commons}} <!-- No call to {{out of copyright in}} in this branch. --> }}
Can an admin or template edtiopr review the changes in {{ PD-US-1923-abroad/sandbox}} against the sandbox and swap them into the main template to restore some functionality that appeared to have got lost in some past editing?. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 20:18, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 20:19, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
This template should be renamed "PD-US-1924-abroad". Jonghyunchung ( talk) 09:30, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
It is publish+120 years If the date of death of the author is unknown,but If that date is know,It will always be life+70 years SigmaAnt ( talk) 13:33, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The call to the template {{ Out of copyright in}} needs replacing with {{ Copy to Wikimedia Commons in}}, as there has been a successful merge request. Xeroctic ( talk) 16:13, 30 January 2024 (UTC)