![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
Ahem... Yes, I know their aweful... Lol. But that can be changed after Its been completed right? Angel Emfrbl 12:07, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
For the color scheme, perhaps making the top bar yellow, with the other bars being sky blue. The "One Piece" on the top bar will be dark blue, while the words on the other bars are orange. I don't know the codes for the colors, so can anyone else do this? Sigmasonic X 22:01, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
[ General] Cuttyflam 10:05, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
I edited the template yesterday with some minor changes. Angel Emfrbl reverted it. Since I really don't want to start an edit-war, I've put it up for discussion. got Whiskey Peak, Little Garden, etc, etc. Like the original list on the old main page.
A. Main Character to Straw Hat Pirates. Duh, they're the main characters.
B. Editing Lucci and Spandam out, the entire CP9 in.
C. Villians to Enemies. Buggy and Wapol can hardly be called evil. Neither does Gedatsu and some others, but that's D.
D. Re-entering BW, CP9 and Skypiea's Priests in the Enemies part. Crocodile is merely the enemy in Arabasta, you've still got Little Garden and Whiskey Peak, both in which BW were the enemy, just not Croc. Like the original list, where you had "Baroque Works, Sir Crocodile", "Skypeia's Priests, Eneru" and just the CP9 near the end of the list.
Objections?
If we include every enemy, it'll get quite crowded. Only the main villains should be included, just like how the Character List used to be. If you mean just putting, for example,
Cipher Pol under the Villains section, then that would be pointless, because they are already under Other Factions.
Sigmasonic X
01:25, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
I'm not suggesting removal of the section, just slight modification. Hardly noticeable. Kurigiri 21:26, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
Personally, I think we should just have the leaders of the organizations in the "Enemies" section. Afterall, if we include "Baroque Works" along with "Sir Crocodile" there, why shouldn't we include "Bellamy Pirates" along with "Bellamy" and so on? I feel it would make the template too top heavy, so I think it would be best for the leader and the organization to be kept seperate. Or, alternatively, we could simply forgo the leaders' articles and place the crews in the "Enemy" section, though this would make the "Pirate Crew" section practically useless. Sigmasonic X 15:57, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
The edits I made to the Enemies section was only in order for it to match the original list from the past version of the main One Piece article. Still, because during the BW saga, croc is only the enemy in arabsta, and you've still got two islands without no enemy. Very not OP-like. Kurigiri 20:35, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
I have a suggestion for the factions section... Why not have it:
Or is this suggesting too much??? Angel Emfrbl 09:01, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
Well I set up the basics of this page today so added it back in (can't say I'm proud of my effort... Because I didn't know how to approach it). Hmm... Everyone agree with it on whether its okay to replace that? It was removed previously. Angel Emfrbl 10:52, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
Ack! I'm trying to save a dozen pages related to One Piece now because someone stepped in. One of the changes he has noted is the size of the template compared to some of the pages. I don't think its worth going back to two different templates, so anyone any ideas how to strink this. Man all this is making my head spin thinking about it. Ideas anyone? >_<' Angel Emfrbl 12:55, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
Most of the early translations are putting it down as '4 Emperors', so for now its what I can only write it as. Angel Emfrbl 10:13, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Is it really neccesary to have Garp's and Dragon's full name in the template? it's just spoilers. We could write just "Garp" and "Dragon". right? Kurigiri 22:07, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
I wanted to bring up the idea of designs of new templates for the One Piece articles. The Templates look like this: Story Arcs, Related Articles, Factions , Characters. Each Navi Template has a link to the other Templates, and as you can see, are smaller and neater but still allow easy movement through the articles.
Also the change to the General will look like this; As you can see "general" has been split into five separate templates, each to be placed on the pages featured in the template. RecklessFire 21:31, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
| ||||||||||||
Information
|
General
|
Sunday I reverted the templates back to the orginal. Reason being is the same as the discussions we had a long time ago... Everyone prefers one single template (according to the discussion on the Main One Piece Talk Page).
For now though, the characters template has also been removed as per discussion on how to improve things. The characters now are only accessable on the main template via their factions pages. Then you can acess other characters by the Character Template. The trouble if we put the character back onto this template is that its likely to led to the same old "template too big" problem. In short we are going to have to accept things as they are until we can think up something better. Its sutiable have their links accessed via the factions pages, this is generally a standard and acceptable layout on other anime (or otherwise) wikipedia pages so we shouldn't have any problems with it here.
Other changes include the removal of the sagas section. This was because they are gone now (deleted + merged into one article). Otherall, the template is now smaller and essentially a lot more suitable to wikipedia. The character template needs tweaking, we'll have a discussion on that later.
Any further suggestions anyone has, feel free to bring them up. We can't touch the English adpations bit for now due to a cirrent discussion. Otherwise, this is the state of the template as of my signing this comment. Angel Emfrbl 09:46, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
The template does not appear to be displaying season 11 on my machine, despite clearing cache and giving the template a decent amount of time to update. じん ない 04:06, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
oi, season 10 is too big it needs to be broken up. Like at the archipelago arc on to the current episodes should be season 11, instead of merging it together with the thriller back arc - saiyo (November 13 2009)
![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
Ahem... Yes, I know their aweful... Lol. But that can be changed after Its been completed right? Angel Emfrbl 12:07, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
For the color scheme, perhaps making the top bar yellow, with the other bars being sky blue. The "One Piece" on the top bar will be dark blue, while the words on the other bars are orange. I don't know the codes for the colors, so can anyone else do this? Sigmasonic X 22:01, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
[ General] Cuttyflam 10:05, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
I edited the template yesterday with some minor changes. Angel Emfrbl reverted it. Since I really don't want to start an edit-war, I've put it up for discussion. got Whiskey Peak, Little Garden, etc, etc. Like the original list on the old main page.
A. Main Character to Straw Hat Pirates. Duh, they're the main characters.
B. Editing Lucci and Spandam out, the entire CP9 in.
C. Villians to Enemies. Buggy and Wapol can hardly be called evil. Neither does Gedatsu and some others, but that's D.
D. Re-entering BW, CP9 and Skypiea's Priests in the Enemies part. Crocodile is merely the enemy in Arabasta, you've still got Little Garden and Whiskey Peak, both in which BW were the enemy, just not Croc. Like the original list, where you had "Baroque Works, Sir Crocodile", "Skypeia's Priests, Eneru" and just the CP9 near the end of the list.
Objections?
If we include every enemy, it'll get quite crowded. Only the main villains should be included, just like how the Character List used to be. If you mean just putting, for example,
Cipher Pol under the Villains section, then that would be pointless, because they are already under Other Factions.
Sigmasonic X
01:25, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
I'm not suggesting removal of the section, just slight modification. Hardly noticeable. Kurigiri 21:26, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
Personally, I think we should just have the leaders of the organizations in the "Enemies" section. Afterall, if we include "Baroque Works" along with "Sir Crocodile" there, why shouldn't we include "Bellamy Pirates" along with "Bellamy" and so on? I feel it would make the template too top heavy, so I think it would be best for the leader and the organization to be kept seperate. Or, alternatively, we could simply forgo the leaders' articles and place the crews in the "Enemy" section, though this would make the "Pirate Crew" section practically useless. Sigmasonic X 15:57, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
The edits I made to the Enemies section was only in order for it to match the original list from the past version of the main One Piece article. Still, because during the BW saga, croc is only the enemy in arabsta, and you've still got two islands without no enemy. Very not OP-like. Kurigiri 20:35, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
I have a suggestion for the factions section... Why not have it:
Or is this suggesting too much??? Angel Emfrbl 09:01, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
Well I set up the basics of this page today so added it back in (can't say I'm proud of my effort... Because I didn't know how to approach it). Hmm... Everyone agree with it on whether its okay to replace that? It was removed previously. Angel Emfrbl 10:52, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
Ack! I'm trying to save a dozen pages related to One Piece now because someone stepped in. One of the changes he has noted is the size of the template compared to some of the pages. I don't think its worth going back to two different templates, so anyone any ideas how to strink this. Man all this is making my head spin thinking about it. Ideas anyone? >_<' Angel Emfrbl 12:55, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
Most of the early translations are putting it down as '4 Emperors', so for now its what I can only write it as. Angel Emfrbl 10:13, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Is it really neccesary to have Garp's and Dragon's full name in the template? it's just spoilers. We could write just "Garp" and "Dragon". right? Kurigiri 22:07, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
I wanted to bring up the idea of designs of new templates for the One Piece articles. The Templates look like this: Story Arcs, Related Articles, Factions , Characters. Each Navi Template has a link to the other Templates, and as you can see, are smaller and neater but still allow easy movement through the articles.
Also the change to the General will look like this; As you can see "general" has been split into five separate templates, each to be placed on the pages featured in the template. RecklessFire 21:31, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
| ||||||||||||
Information
|
General
|
Sunday I reverted the templates back to the orginal. Reason being is the same as the discussions we had a long time ago... Everyone prefers one single template (according to the discussion on the Main One Piece Talk Page).
For now though, the characters template has also been removed as per discussion on how to improve things. The characters now are only accessable on the main template via their factions pages. Then you can acess other characters by the Character Template. The trouble if we put the character back onto this template is that its likely to led to the same old "template too big" problem. In short we are going to have to accept things as they are until we can think up something better. Its sutiable have their links accessed via the factions pages, this is generally a standard and acceptable layout on other anime (or otherwise) wikipedia pages so we shouldn't have any problems with it here.
Other changes include the removal of the sagas section. This was because they are gone now (deleted + merged into one article). Otherall, the template is now smaller and essentially a lot more suitable to wikipedia. The character template needs tweaking, we'll have a discussion on that later.
Any further suggestions anyone has, feel free to bring them up. We can't touch the English adpations bit for now due to a cirrent discussion. Otherwise, this is the state of the template as of my signing this comment. Angel Emfrbl 09:46, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
The template does not appear to be displaying season 11 on my machine, despite clearing cache and giving the template a decent amount of time to update. じん ない 04:06, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
oi, season 10 is too big it needs to be broken up. Like at the archipelago arc on to the current episodes should be season 11, instead of merging it together with the thriller back arc - saiyo (November 13 2009)