On 23 August 2023, it was proposed that this page be moved to Template:Efn-note. The result of the discussion was not moved. |
The "documentation" of this template does not, in fact, document the use of this template (it merely mentions it in a table of similar templates). I had to look at the template code to figure out why it even exists (apparently, merely to avoid typing "|group=note"). If this template is going to stick around, it should "justify" its existence by documenting how and why it should be used (vis-a-vis any other footnote-related template). - dcljr ( talk) 13:51, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
{{
efn}}
, you should be using that instead. --
Redrose64 🌹 (
talk)
07:52, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
{{
efn-ua}}
, {{
efn-lr}}
, etc., a fact that would be more clear if it were named {{efn-note}}
. Perhaps it should just be moved to that name (leaving a redirect). -
dcljr (
talk)
02:14, 1 August 2022 (UTC)The result of the move request was: not moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky ( talk) 11:53, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
– Consistency with other footnote templates, see H:PREGROUP. – Material Works 22:06, 23 August 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. Sennecaster ( Chat) 04:33, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
{{
efn-notenum}}
/ {{
notelist-notenum}}
, where this pair generates named endlinks "note #" , and not a freeform label where one could enter such a name as a parameter into NoteTag --
67.70.25.80 (
talk)
08:37, 25 August 2023 (UTC){{notelist-note}}
seems a bit redundant, no? —
TechnoSquirrel69 (
sigh)
05:25, 9 September 2023 (UTC)On 23 August 2023, it was proposed that this page be moved to Template:Efn-note. The result of the discussion was not moved. |
The "documentation" of this template does not, in fact, document the use of this template (it merely mentions it in a table of similar templates). I had to look at the template code to figure out why it even exists (apparently, merely to avoid typing "|group=note"). If this template is going to stick around, it should "justify" its existence by documenting how and why it should be used (vis-a-vis any other footnote-related template). - dcljr ( talk) 13:51, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
{{
efn}}
, you should be using that instead. --
Redrose64 🌹 (
talk)
07:52, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
{{
efn-ua}}
, {{
efn-lr}}
, etc., a fact that would be more clear if it were named {{efn-note}}
. Perhaps it should just be moved to that name (leaving a redirect). -
dcljr (
talk)
02:14, 1 August 2022 (UTC)The result of the move request was: not moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky ( talk) 11:53, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
– Consistency with other footnote templates, see H:PREGROUP. – Material Works 22:06, 23 August 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. Sennecaster ( Chat) 04:33, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
{{
efn-notenum}}
/ {{
notelist-notenum}}
, where this pair generates named endlinks "note #" , and not a freeform label where one could enter such a name as a parameter into NoteTag --
67.70.25.80 (
talk)
08:37, 25 August 2023 (UTC){{notelist-note}}
seems a bit redundant, no? —
TechnoSquirrel69 (
sigh)
05:25, 9 September 2023 (UTC)