From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I don't think the current split up is very good. Technically Frp is also in opposition. Better to have Governmental/Opposition/Not represented Fornadan (t) 10:05, 17 August 2005 (UTC) reply

Hi, the FrP "in opposition" is a bit of a strain. All of the current political polls sum up FrP with the government parties, and Carl I. Hagen made some suggestions about who should be the next prime minister if the right wing wins. In any case, I shrunk the header of the government parties to three columns, so FrP is indeed on the same line, but not under "the same roof". -- Orzetto 15:14, 17 August 2005 (UTC) reply

Number of symbols

Hi, I start wondering whether there are too many party logos in the template. What about having all the non-parliamentary parties in just a text list? I think there should also be a historical section—the first example would be Nasjonal Samling. -- Orzetto 17:24, 7 September 2005 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I don't think the current split up is very good. Technically Frp is also in opposition. Better to have Governmental/Opposition/Not represented Fornadan (t) 10:05, 17 August 2005 (UTC) reply

Hi, the FrP "in opposition" is a bit of a strain. All of the current political polls sum up FrP with the government parties, and Carl I. Hagen made some suggestions about who should be the next prime minister if the right wing wins. In any case, I shrunk the header of the government parties to three columns, so FrP is indeed on the same line, but not under "the same roof". -- Orzetto 15:14, 17 August 2005 (UTC) reply

Number of symbols

Hi, I start wondering whether there are too many party logos in the template. What about having all the non-parliamentary parties in just a text list? I think there should also be a historical section—the first example would be Nasjonal Samling. -- Orzetto 17:24, 7 September 2005 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook